• commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    A good way to is poll twice

    what makes you think this is a good method for proving your claim that 2-3% of all voters were democrat voters who switched to green in past elections?

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        none of the data or graphs are proof that 2-3% of voters have voted green but would have otherwise voted democrat. demanding proof for a claim isn’t rude.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a good way of saying what people are thinking of doing, and that’s exactly what was happening in Michigan a few weeks ago. Given how close the election is likely to be in that state, even a far smaller number of people voting G instead of D will throw the country for Trump.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          For sure. But of the people who vote for the greens, many more would have chosen to vote for a Democrat instead.

          The Green party could:

          • Run candidates in the Democratic primaries (the DSA has done this to considerable success at the state level)
          • Run candidates in districts where Democrats aren’t running
          • Build up power by starting at a local level and winning elections there to create people with a base of supporters who can win in larger and larger areas

          But they don’t do those things in the US, and instead choose to run candidates where they effectively serve as spoilers

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            For sure. But of the people who vote for the greens, many more would have chosen to vote for a Democrat instead.

            this totally misses the point: if democrats are worried about losing to republicans, they should be trying to convince people to vote democrat instead of republican. if they’re only worried about republicans getting into power and they believe this nonsense about splitting votes, they should vote for the greens.

            i for one do NOT believe in this vote-splitting narrative. it assumes that the votes somehow belong to democrats and green candidates steal them. the votes belong to voters, and it’s the job of parties to earn those votes, and using FUCKING ABHORENT tactics like keeping other parties out of debates or off the ballot are not how you earn MY vote. i’m sure many others feel the same.

            • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              They need to be worried about both losing moderate and low-information voters to the Republicans and losing left-of-center voters to the Greens.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                it’s not as though they don’t know the policies green voters like. they’re not losing left of center voters to the greens, tehy’re choosing not to attract them and instead play dirty political games.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            they don’t do those things in the US

            this is a fucking lie. do you get all your information about the green party from msnbc, or directly from the dnc?

            • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve been watching the Green Party for decades. I see lot of behavior which looks like people running to be on the ballot. I don’t see a lot of people running campaigns which look like they’re designed to win.

              • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Getting on the ballot is a VERY tiny step compared to what it takes to win. You can get on the ballot for a local election by paying a filing fee and asking a few friends to sign.

                Actually winning means spending a huge amount of time talking with community groups, obtaining earned media, raising money, and actually convincing people that you can govern in a way that’s better than the other candidates.

                • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Getting on the ballot is a VERY tiny step compared to what it takes to win. You can get on the ballot for a local election by paying a filing fee and asking a few friends to sign.

                  the green party literally goes to court over ballot access at least twice a decade. you are either woefully misinformed or intentionally spreading misinformation

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I see lot of behavior which looks like people running to be on the ballot.

                when JUST GETTING ON THE BALLOT is over half the fight, it’s understandable that this is a lot of what they do. what do you think running to win looks like? hiring peter dao? nominating a candidate who already has both a good reputation and name recognition? if the greens did that, would you still tell them to “push for policy concessions,” but drop out and endorse the democrat whether they get them or not?

            • zpoex@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              … You don’t think telling someone else that their opinion is “a fucking lie” is rude or mean? I mean sure you can disagree with them, but like just don’t be so angry lol