I would assume the accusation and headline would be much different if there was any kind of direct link to support a claim involving Jewry, CSAM, and public grooming.
I think this user was misinterpreted (as I misinterpreted it myself, originally). They’re claiming that the outcry, should legitimate issues be present, would have a different wording.
I would assume the accusation and headline would be much different if there was any kind of direct link to support a claim involving Jewry, CSAM, and public grooming.
Edit: grammar
Jewry?
I think this user was misinterpreted (as I misinterpreted it myself, originally). They’re claiming that the outcry, should legitimate issues be present, would have a different wording.
Thank you, this is the correct interpretation.