• Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In this case the communist attacked you and started shooting you first. I’d imagine most would defend themselves when attacked

    It’s an interesting idea though that anyone who communists attack are Nazis. Maybe the funniest conclusion from that is that Vietnamese were Nazis since China attacked Vietnam in 1979.

    • TheGamingLuddite [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Finnish state that fought the Soviet Union, the one which was allied with Nazi Germany, was only established after the wholesale massacre of communists and workers. Anticommunism is the modus operandi of fascism in all its forms. The axis powers in WWII were formalized in the “Anti-Comintern Pact” to which Finland was a signatory.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Using something happened in 1918 and especially 1941 to justify calling Finland Nazi during Winter War that happened in 1939-40 seems fairly creative.

        Interesting thing about the Civil War and Winter War though. After the Civil War Finland was heavily divided nation for a long time. And while the wounds had started to heal some, it was the opposition to the Soviet attack that actually brought the left and right together. I’m not sure how true it is, but I’ve heard Stalin expected the Finnish workers to celebrate him coming over and “freeing them” and was quite surprised that they were having none of that.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It would feel a bit strange to say Finland was Nazi during Winter War because during Continuation War Finland was Axis aligned when the USSR attack in Winter War is the biggest reason Finland sought closer ties with Germany.

        • diegeticscream[all]🔻@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So:

          • The Soviet Union feared that the noted anti-communists in control of Finland would allow it to be used as an operating base for the Nazis.

          • The USSR attempted diplomatic resolution to those fears with Finland.

          • They were denied.

          • The USSR invades Finland to secure safety from that fear.

          • They win.

          • The noted anti-communists in control of Finland then allow it to be used by the Nazis as a base for the Nazis, and support them in attacking the USSR.

          You’re saying the Continuation War happened solely because of the Winter War, and that the noted anti-communists were in no-way ideologically aligned with the Nazis before the USSR’s attack?

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            The USSR wanted Finland to give it areas including the main Finnish defensive line. Knowing what happened with Czechoslovakia and “just a few areas” and knowing what happened to Baltics, it’s easy to see what road that would’ve taken Finland down on.

            You’re saying the Continuation War happened solely because of the Winter War

            No, I’m saying Finland sought help from the Nazis because during Winter War Finland was left completely alone, the preferred alliance direction of Nordics or UK/France/US panning out to not have done much at all. And both sides, USSR and Finland knew it was just a temporarily truce and another war was coming. Obviously Finland didn’t want to be alone, again.

            the noted anti-communists were in no-way ideologically aligned with the Nazis before the USSR’s attack

            Mostly the Finnish leadership were noted anglophiles.

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                For sure. But both sides saw another war coming and with how close Finland was to being fully occupied, the worry was that this time Soviet Union wouldn’t stop until they had achieved that. Understandable worry in my opinion, even though fighting alongside Nazis is a black mark on Finnish history.

                • diegeticscream[all]🔻@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  But both sides saw another war coming.

                  Not if they accepted the loss.

                  worry was that this time Soviet Union wouldn’t stop until they had achieved that.

                  The same USSR that recognized Finnish independence in 1918?

                  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Not if they accepted the loss.

                    No I really meant that both sides knew that this wasn’t over. Both considered it unfinished (heh) business.

                    The same USSR that recognized Finnish independence in 1918?

                    The very same (or well, it had changed a bunch but still). Though the Soviet attempt to conquer Finland during Winter War, that had just happened, might’ve been a bit more prominent in peoples’ minds than 1918.

            • Vertraumir@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              wanted Finland to give it areas

              And offered more area in Karelia in return, it wasn’t some kind of a one-sided deal

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Area cutting through the Finnish main defensive line and an important peninsula and harbor close to Helsinki vs. areas in the middle of nowhere in Karelia. It wasn’t a one-sided suggestion, in fact by area I think the offer was bigger, but it’s easy to see why it wasn’t accepted when you consider what would be given and where.