Even China’s population of 1.4 billion would not be enough to fill all the empty apartments littered across the country, a former official said on Saturday, in a rare public critique of the country’s crisis-hit property market.

China’s property sector, once the pillar of the economy, has slumped since 2021 when real estate giant China Evergrande Group (3333.HK) defaulted on its debt obligations following a clampdown on new borrowing.

Big-name developers such as Country Garden Holdings (2007.HK) continue to teeter close to default even to this day, keeping home-buyer sentiment depressed.

As of the end of August, the combined floor area of unsold homes stood at 648 million square metres (7 billion square feet), the latest data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) show.

That would be equal to 7.2 million homes, according to Reuters calculations, based on the average home size of 90 square metres.

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Alright I’ll bite, what makes the world’s declared democracies actually undemocratic in your mind?

      • Serdan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Billionaires directly or indirectly buying elections, politicians, drafting policies, funding propaganda, regulatory capture, etc.

        • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The democratic world doesn’t start and end with America

          • Serdan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I live in Denmark. All liberal democracies are subject to the whims of billionaires.

            Edit: oh wait, you’re Canadian. That’s fucking hilarious.

          • kautau@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure, and I’ll agree that many places are actual democracies, but that doesn’t mean they’re free from corruption. You’re both sort of right. There are democracies that work. But none of them are without corruption.

            • Serdan@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The corruption is baked into the system. I did not have anything illegal in mind when I wrote that list.

              There can be no democracy without economic democracy.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                There can be no democracy without economic democracy.

                Economic democracies are even rarer than political ones, and I’m not aware of any actually complete one. Europe still gets you closest, especially Germany and Austria, with very strong co-determination laws, in Germany’s case reserving 50% - 1 board seats for the shop floor council – the workers don’t need much capital in that case to control the company.

                And as far as I’m aware there’s not, and never has been, a single country that is not politically a democracy that would be an economic democracy. Certain people might be thinking of state capitalist countries in that context but those never liked worker control of anything, not unions, not shop floor councils, not nothing. They just dressed themselves in it. Ask, random example, Solidarność.

    • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its a democracy when you’re in the global north, it’s autocracy when you’re in the global south.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love how you’re getting downvoted, likely by people who feel a sense of enlightenment in that they can identify Chinese propaganda that has been pointed out to them as such but have no clue about propaganda originating from their own country or from a country theirs is allied with.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why is propaganda always the go-to argument? Even if I identify US propaganda, it doesn’t make me more or less likely to hate it, which I don’t, even if I disapprove of some of their measures as much as I do of my own country. It’s such a baffling argument.

        • Serdan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because most people are steeped in propaganda they don’t see.

          You say you don’t hate USA. You should. The US state is engaged in several ongoing genocides. Can you name them?

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “You should” 😂 Sounds to me like you have an agenda and are spreading propaganda of your own. But please, enlighten me on those genocides with reliable sources.

            • Serdan@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I have convictions that inform my opinions. I think it’s obvious that any decent person should hate USA, given their many, many crimes.

              I guess you could characterize all communication as propaganda, but that seems rather pointless.

              • Lemminary@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s not pointless to say that when it’s clear that you want to drive public opinion by only emphasizing and exaggerating the bad without sources. It’s the literal definition of propaganda.

                I still welcome that list of ongoing genocides with their credible sources.

                • Serdan@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m not driving anything. I’m just a dude commenting on a public forum. You’re being very silly. 🙄

                  When did I volunteer to educate you? That you can’t answer, and seemingly think the very notion is ridiculous, is exactly the point.

                  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Then why the need to denigrate the US and insist that there are active genocides without providing evidence? This isn’t about educating anyone, it’s about supporting your own claims. Very sus.

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’ve generalized my post to completely omit the “or from a country theirs is allied with” so you can cut the smartass act.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            According to the Danes, definitely.

            Ironically, founded to “stop the encroachment by the Germans” the Kalmar union first had a Pommeranian King, and then a Saxon one.