• jonne@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, I don’t really have any issues with accepting a lab leak possibility, but the lab leak people generally add a whole bunch of other conspiracies on top of that (it was designed as a bioweapon, leaked intentionally, etc), and nobody can really explain why this would be any good as a bioweapon if it hurts you as much as your enemies, and if you release it without having a vaccine for it.

    • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the bio weapon part is from people who don’t understand what research is going on lab. They hear “gain of function” research and immediately think Resident Evil type bio weapon.

      Not that I agree that type of research is good for us to be doing in the first place. But I do understand the reason we do that type if research is to learn about viruses and how to combat them as they mutate. I think it’s stupid to be doing that type of research anywhere, especially finding China.

      • notacat@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Gain of function” is an extremely broad category that is an absolutely necessary part of molecular biology research.