• Communist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mentioning steam deck is fine. Valve supports it. It’s pretty official. I don’t see why you care.

    • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because it discourages native Linux game development for something ‘good enough’ using a windows compatibility layer that really is just a large hack. That’s why I care. Games for Linux should be made naively for Linux, to bolster the Linux operating system. When wine/proton fails, people confuse it with being the fault of Linux, when it’s not. It is the fault of running software not made for Linux to begin with on a compatibility layer. Those problems unnecessarily tarnish Linux. It’s wrong, it really shouldn’t be allowed, and I’d be happy to see Wine/Proton sued out of existence to prevent it.

      • Communist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a chicken-egg problem.

        If they hadn’t done this first it would’ve never happened at all.

          • Communist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            …so, you think that means that it would’ve been fine without proton? You’re dreaming.

            • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Either native or not at all. The way proton sits in the middle leaves Linux with all the complaints when it goes wrong. Not Linux’s fault. It’s people like you that are to blame for putting Linux in a situation it should never have been in. Linux does not need games, anyway. Games are for children.