• SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am blaming Batman for his choice and for his reasoning.
    He pulls the trigger, Joker (a psycho who’s killed dozens/hundreds already and will kill even more) dies.
    He doesn’t pull the trigger, 3-4 innocent people die now and Joker goes on to kill scores more.

    I argue Batman can’t just wash his hands of responsibility because he CHOSE to put himself in that position. He decided to be the one with a motorcycle cannon pointed at Joker’s face. If he didn’t want to be responsible for life and death, he should have stayed home and gotten a massage. But no, he chose to be the city’s defender, so there he is.

    Perhaps it helps to drop the movie and pick another analogy. Imagine there’s a mass shooter psycho walking around shooting children, and there’s a police officer with weapon drawn and pointed at the psycho. Police officer decides not to shoot the psycho because his conscience says he doesn’t want to kill anybody. And because he doesn’t take the shot, the psycho kills 3-4 more kids.
    Do you argue the officer is blameless for those childrens’ deaths?