I’m never putting one of these in my home.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Be careful running it in a Pi because it’s a little heavy for that depending on how you configure it. A Pi model 4 is probably OK, but you wouldn’t want to run it on a model 3 or something even older, and you’re going to want to use one with at least 4GB of RAM.

    • Cihta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ll get a lot of hate for this but when you say pi you mean pi4. I kept seeing this HA on lemmy and tried it on a pi2. I don’t know if it worked or not, it’s a very bloated piece of software. After an hour of waiting I installed docker and the HA instance on my main server (which is ancient) in under a minute.

      It’s cool and all but my feit dimmers require some pcb work and flashing to be compatible so verify what devices you have before you hop in.

      I used to have an automated building running on a bare 386 and a floppy drive. Hate on me all you want but sending simple commands like turn device on shouldn’t require a giant software package but otherwise HA is neat, just a lot of overhead i can’t exactly justify.

      Worth trying out though.

      I think reflow stole a lot of their code.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        No hate from me.

        Just about every project I’ve started with a pi has ended up working out a lot better as a vm on an x86 host. But lots of people seem to love them.

        • Cihta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          To be fair It has its uses i suppose. I’ve had one running pihole since the original pi came out. Used PI2s in the past for OSMC and, even better, ambilight.

          I think now a cheap android TV box you can flash is probably better for a simple less than 5watt device.

          Besides the HA test I’ve been trying to use one to be an openvpn TAP interface but it’s been a fight and i think you just convinced me to do it in another docker instance on the server and save myself some headaches.

          • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            PiVPN was actually one of the things I thought the HW handled pretty well. Other than how much it ends up getting throttled by the 100Mbps link.

            • Cihta@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              It seems like it would but the pivpn install script always hangs on me whether i I select openvpn or wireguard. Based on some reading I was lead to believe I needed to just use raw openvpn for a TAP interface. I’ve tried a few times but I always end up with CA issues or just flat out failure to connect.

              It should be pretty simple, I’m just trying to bridge my network to a single remote device connected via cellular gateway. Maybe I’m just out of my depth. I’ve done it before with an old NAS years ago but I’ve tried a few step by step guides and no dice.

              If you have any tips that’d be great!

              • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Wish I could help.

                I used it a few years ago for a simple wireguard link but eventually moved the vpn into my opnsense instance