A YouTube prankster who was shot by one his targets told jurors Tuesday he had no inkling he had scared or angered the man who fired on him as the prank was recorded.

Tanner Cook, whose “Classified Goons” channel on YouTube has more than 55,000 subscribers, testified nonchalantly about the shooting at start of the trial for 31-year-old Alan Colie, who’s charged with aggravated malicious wounding and two firearms counts.

The April 2 shooting at the food court in Dulles Town Center, about 45 minutes west of Washington, D.C., set off a panic as shoppers fled what they feared to be a mass shooting.

Jurors also saw video of the shooting, recorded by Cook’s associates. The two interacted for less than 30 seconds. Video shows Cook approaching Colie, a DoorDash driver, as he picked up an order. The 6-foot-5 (1.95-meter-tall) Cook looms over Colie while holding a cellphone about 6 inches (15 centimeters) from Colie’s face. The phone broadcasts the phrase “Hey dips—-, quit thinking about my twinkle” multiple times through a Google Translate app.

On the video, Colie says “stop” three different times and tries to back away from Cook, who continues to advance. Colie tries to knock the phone away from his face before pulling out a gun and shooting Cook in the lower left chest.

Cook, 21, testified Tuesday that he tries to confuse the targets of his pranks for the amusement of his online audience. He said he doesn’t seek to elicit fear or anger, but acknowledged his targets often react that way.

Asked why he didn’t stop the prank despite Colie’s repeated requests, Cook said he “almost did” but not because he sensed fear or anger from Colie. He said Colie simply wasn’t exhibiting the type of reaction Cook was looking for.

“There was no reaction,” Cook said.

In opening statements, prosecutors urged jurors to set aside the off-putting nature of Cook’s pranks.

“It was stupid. It was silly. And you may even think it was offensive,” prosecutor Pamela Jones said. “But that’s all it was — a cellphone in the ear that got Tanner shot.”

Defense attorney Tabatha Blake said her client didn’t have the benefit of knowing he was a prank victim when he was confronted with Cook’s confusing behavior.

She said the prosecution’s account of the incident “diminishes how unsettling they were to Mr. Alan Colie at the time they occurred.”

In the video, before the encounter with Colie, Cook and his friends can be heard workshopping the phrase they want to play on the phone. One of the friends urges that it be “short, weird and awkward.”

Cook’s “Classified Goons” channel is replete with repellent stunts, like pretending to vomit on Uber drivers and following unsuspecting customers through department stores. At a preliminary hearing, sheriff’s deputies testified that they were well aware of Cook and have received calls about previous stunts. Cook acknowledged during cross-examination Tuesday that mall security had tossed him out the day prior to the shooting as he tried to record pranks and that he was trying to avoid security the day he targeted Colie.

Jury selection took an entire day Monday, largely because of publicity the case received in the area. At least one juror said during the selection process that she herself had been a victim of one of Cook’s videos.

Cook said he continues to make the videos and earns $2,000 or $3,000 a month. His subscriber base increased from 39,000 before the shooting to 55,000 after.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Asked why he didn’t stop the prank despite Colie’s repeated requests, Cook said he “almost did” but not because he sensed fear or anger from Colie. He said Colie simply wasn’t exhibiting the type of reaction Cook was looking for.

    He wasn’t giving me material for my viewers, so I kept annoying him until he shot me! Why is this my fault?!

  • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope Colie goes free and I hope Cook gets sued for everything he has. I don’t know what you’d sue him for, but find something before he gets someone actually killed.

    • Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think getting shot is punishment enough, but Cook should at least be banned from posting anymore pranks to his YouTube. They should really shut down his YouTube channel if we’re being honest and nothing of value will be lost.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pain and emotional suffering is always available. If he pressed charges then all of his legal fees as well. The lost wages from being locked up… etc.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fuck all that. Attitudes like that are why Americans think they can just blast away. You won’t see my pistol until I’m certain killing you is my very last resort. And if I pull it, it’s because I mean to use it.

      Did this idiot think his life was in danger from an annoying man with a cell phone, in the middle of a fucking food court?! No. He used his gun as a “get off of me” tool. He’s damned lucky Cook survived.

      EDIT: I seriously hope some of you people do not conceal carry. The comments here are terrifying and completely ignorant of case law, attitudes comprised only of feels.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        So you’re going to wait until you’re hit/shot to try and pull your gun out?

        The only more escalatory thing the YouTuber could have done is actually hit the guy. This is exactly when you need to have your gun out.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The aggressor was a loud-mouthed bully in a very public place. I’ve dealt with these assholes since elementary school in the 70s. They’re cowards, one and all. Perhaps such behavior is more threatening to younger folks? I gather kids don’t get their ass beat on the regular in school any longer? In any case, I think I would have instantly known what I was looking at.

          Also, seems the bully didn’t speak any “fighting words”, and that may be key. OTOH, Virginia holds no duty to retreat. Feels like thin legal ice for the shooter.

          And no, I’m not giving him the chance to hit me. I’m hyper aware of my ability to draw. If I felt that option was about to be taken from me? Yeah, that almost certainly would have crossed the line.

      • joel_feila@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He could very well think that. One friend of mine gets a fraid for his saftey if protest is in the area. I have scared the shit out of people by just walking near them.

        Now in the era of mass shooting would i be afraid that some ahole came up to like would i think this is a prelude to getting shot. I might honestly think that

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Lmao. Cops shoot people who just ignore them and get a vacation. This guy has a stranger in his face suddenly who won’t leave him alone and keeps getting closer despite repeated commands not to and you think he has no right?

          • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fuck cops and fuck people who support shooting people because they’re scared. You’re no better than cop aoplogists.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yes we should all just die instead because you learned in Hollywood that there’s magically no fear if you’re in the right.

          • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Cops have no right either, often. They get away with it because they are cops. This guy isn’t getting away with it, nor should he. Just because the system lets off corrupt cops doesn’t mean it let’s everyone off.

            I know he doesn’t have a right to self defense here because I passed my first year courses in law school.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Cool, first year law courses. Come back when you’ve spent years doing tactical training. The only more escalatory thing the YouTuber could have done is actually hitting them. At which point it’s too late. We don’t live in Hollywood land where the bad guy stands back to let the hero do whatever they want. Court rulings generally support this unless the state is a duty to retreat state. But Virginia is a stand your ground state. (As are most states these days)

              What the YouTuber did is colloquially called Bulldogging and the entire point is to intimidate someone with an intimation of physical threat.

              • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                1 year ago

                Lol tactical training? This is a legal question not a bootcamp hypothetical.

                You don’t get to kill people for walking toward you. Nobody would like living in that world. Not even in a stand your ground state is merely walking toward someone an imminent threat to life. You have been tricked if you believe this.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Bootcamp? And just walking toward someone? I see you learned to properly research stuff already. The article at the top describes the video in vivid detail. He got right up on him with intentionally disorienting noises. Pushed the phone right up towards his head. Ignored physical and verbal commands to stop and just got closer. That’s not someone just calmly walking towards you on a sidewalk.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Seems these people are forgetting this was in a, presumably crowded, food court, and not a dark alley. Shooter is on very thin legal ice, very thin.

          Also, seems some of these folks don’t have experience with the garden variety bully. This wasn’t some madman running up on the shooter, this was a bigger guy clearly trying to get a reaction.

          If the aggressor had spoken any “fighting words”, and yes that’s a legal term, I might well have shot him. That does not seem to have been the case.

  • Someonelol@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    These prank channels should be completely demonetized to remove the incentive of doing stupid shit like this in the first place.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No shit curse first 10 seconds get demonetized. Terrorize some one and you can earn 3k a month. YouTube should remove his channel and if they don’t get fucking sue to for allowing the content.

      Fucking shooter a hero and stood his ground prankster should apologize and be greatful he isn’t dead.

      Because as any train gun owner knows your not supposed to pull your gun unless it shoot to kill.

      • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I agree the YouTube kid kind of got what was coming to him, the shooter isn’t a straight up hero.

        As annoying as this kid was it doesn’t sound like he ever touched the guy. I would completely understand the shooter shoving, punching, or even using mace/taser on the YouTube guy, but jumping straight to shooting someone over that is just a bit unhinged behavior, at least in my opinion.

        I am not against CCW or self defense or anything, but the shooter definitely went overboard, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he is found guilty in the court case.

        • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, weird take that annoying somebody or even getting up in their face is grounds for execution. Get security, get the cops, whatever. They weren’t in any danger. They were just scared.

          • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            People get scared because they think they are in danger. The delivery driver didn’t know where things were going to stop in this encounter, and I don’t blame him one bit for putting a stop to it before he got beaten or stabbed.

            But if the delivery driver wasn’t scared it wouldn’t have been a fun prank for mr 6 foot 5 and his dimwit subscribers. He relies on intimidation to get away with his shenanigans, if he wasn’t so physically threatening he would have had his ass beat before now, and deservedly so. Fuck that guy.

            • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Laws don’t dictate morality and entrenching “being scared” as the basis for self-defense laws gives everyone far too much leeway in “being scared” of the black kid with his hood up, or the delivery driver that you got too high to remember, or somebody answering the door to an unindicated police raid with a legal gun in their hand.

              • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                People have a legitimate right to defend themselves. For instance waking up to an unannounced armed intruder in your house justifies the use of force. In this case an unhinged large crazy person was actually harassing someone in a threatening way. They weren’t going about their business with a hoodie on, or delivering a pizza. The court agreed with the defendant that it was a self defense situation and so do I.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What is in the water in Virginia? The video should have killed this case dead. Continuing to advance after being commanded to stop is literally a text book self defense case. Especially when you add in the delivery driver job (one of the most dangerous jobs in the US for violent robbery and car jacking) and the specific intent to disorient and confuse.

    That’s tailor made to elicit a fight or flight response in any reasonable person.

    (Before anyone asks for statistics, delivery drivers make up 1/5th of US work place fatalities according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics)

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I do believe in a duty to retreat but if I saw someone workshopping ways to confuse me with a group of people and refusing my demands to stop harassing me, while they advanced in a bizarre fashion I’d be looking for a clear path to retreat and reaching for my knife. That behavior is unpredictable, invasive, and demonstrates refusal to respect pearly stated boundaries. I’m not one of those paranoid people who doesn’t go anywhere without a gun or anything but there’s no way I’d feel safe in that scenario. I wouldn’t even consider that YouTube prankster is a job some people have, I’d be much more afraid he’s going for my purse or worse.

      And as for the lack of fear, yeah every self defense lesson I’ve had has taught to show no fear nor aggression, you firmly demand the aggressor to back away while looking for an out by which to flee.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I’ve seen people talk about that like the driver somehow pre-meditated the shoot. But it’s actually just a sign of good training on thinking through the adrenaline.

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like a good case of “fuck around and find out” to me. Acting aggressively and being a douche just to get views on YouTube is a good way to get shot. Especially when the shooter specifically asked him to stop several times. I really do not like douche nozzles like this guy.

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh, at least pranksters are willing to risk something.

      Too much watered-down content on youtube that just exists to suck up time without ever hurting anyone’s feelings.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    The prankster evidently has some fans here on lemmy, if this thread is any indication. Bummer. I was hoping lemmy wouldn’t attract people that insufferably stupid.

  • bobman@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let me guess, they’re telling me about footage without showing me the footage.

    Modern “journalism”, everyone.

  • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Only in america is it legal and normal to attempt to murder someone for :checks notes: holding your phone near them.