Like an estimated two-thirds of the worldā€™s population, I donā€™t digest lactose well, which makes the occasional latte an especially pricey proposition. So it was a pleasant surprise when, shortly after moving to San Francisco, I ordered a drink at Blue Bottle Coffee and didnā€™t have to askā€”or pay extraā€”for a milk alternative. Since 2022, the once Oakland-based, now NestlĆ©-owned cafe chain has defaulted to oat milk, both to cut carbon emissions and because lots of its affluent-tending customers were already choosing it as their go-to.

Plant-based milks, a multibillion-dollar global market, arenā€™t just good for the lactose intolerant: Theyā€™re also better for the climate. Dairy cows belch a lot of methane, a greenhouse gas 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide; they contribute at least 7 percent of US methane output, the equivalent emissions of 10 million cars. Cattle need a lot of room to graze, too: Plant-based milks use about a tenth as much land to produce the same quantity of milk. And it takes almost a thousand gallons of water to manufacture a gallon of dairy milkā€”four times the water cost of alt-milk from oats or soy.

But if climate concerns push us toward the alt-milk aisle, dairy still has price on its side. Even though plant-based milks are generally much less resource-intensive, theyā€™re often more expensive. Walk into any Starbucks, and youā€™ll likely pay around 70 cents extra for nondairy options.

. Dairyā€™s affordability edge, explains MarĆ­a Mascaraque, an analyst at market research firm Euromonitor International, relies on the industryā€™s ability to produce ā€œat larger volumes, which drives down the cost per carton.ā€ American demand for milk alternatives, though expected to grow by 10 percent a year through 2030, canā€™t beat those economies of scale. (Globally, alt-milks arenā€™t new on the sceneā€”coconut milk is even mentioned in the Sanskrit epic Mahābhārata, which is thousands of years old.)

What else contributes to cow milkā€™s dominance? Dairy farmers are ā€œpolitical favorites,ā€ says Daniel Sumner, a University of California, Davis, agricultural economist. In addition to support like the ā€œDairy Checkoff,ā€ a joint government-industry program to promote milk products (including the ā€œGot Milk?ā€ campaign), theyā€™ve long raked in direct subsidies currently worth around $1 billion a year.

Big Milk fights hard to maintain those benefits, spending more than $7 million a year on lobbying. That might help explain why the US Department of Agriculture has talked around the climate virtues of meat and dairy alternatives, refusing to factor sustainability into its dietary guidelinesā€”and why it has featured content, such as a 2013 article by thenā€“Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, trumpeting the dairy industry as ā€œleading the way in sustainable innovation.ā€

But the USDA doesnā€™t directly support plant-based milk. It does subsidize some alt-milk ingredientsā€”soybean producers, like dairy, net close to $1 billion a year on average, but that crop largely goes to feeding meat- and dairy-producing livestock and extracting oil. A 2021 report by industry analysts Mintec Limited and Frost Procurement Adventurer also notes that, while the inputs for dairy (such as cattle feed) for dairy are a little more expensive than typical plant-milk ingredients, plant alternatives face higher manufacturing costs. Alt-milk makers, Sumner says, may also have thinner profit margins: Their ā€œstrategy for growth is advertisement and promotion and publicity,ā€ which isnā€™t cheap.

Starbucks, though, does benefit from economies of scale. In Europe, the company is slowly dropping premiums for alt-milks, a move it attributes to wanting to lower corporate emissions. ā€œMarket-level conditions allow us to move more quicklyā€ than other companies, a spokesperson for the coffee giant told me, but didnā€™t say if or when the price drop would happen elsewhere.

In the United States, meanwhile, itā€™s a waiting game to see whether the government or corporations drive down alt-milk costs. Currently, Sumner says, plant-based milk producers operate under an assumption that ā€œprice isnā€™t the main thingā€ for their buyersā€”as long as enough privileged consumers will pay up, alt-milk can fill a premium niche. But itā€™s going to take a bigger market than that to make real progress in curbing emissions from food.

  • Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    2
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    One thing nobody has commented on - how that article slips in a seemingly positive mention of NestlƩ (they own the cafe that uses plant milks). That raised my eyebrows.

      • mranachi@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        Itā€™s enough to drive one to schizophrenia. Everything is a hidden message

        CĢµĢ‰ĶĶ˜Ģ‰ĢšĢŠĢ“ĢŽĢ½Ķ‚Ķ†ĢˆĢ„Ģ”ĶŠĶŠĢƒĢ”Ķ„ĶĢ‚Ģ‘ĢæĢĶ„ĶĶ‘Ģ•Ķ›Ģ†ĶĢ¾Ķ„ĶĢ™Ģ°Ģ»Ģ˜Ģ ĶŽĢ”Ģ¢ĢŸĶ–ĢÆĢ”Ģ¢oĢ“Ķ›Ķ‹ĢĢšĶĢ‚Ķ„Ģ½Ģ“ĶŠĶ‚ĢƒĢ•Ķ€Ģ’ĶĶ’ĢĶ›Ģ“ĢĢ…ĢĢ½Ķ›Ģ‡Ķ†Ķ€Ģ½Ģ›Ģ‹Ķ‹Ģ‹Ķ„ĢĶĶƒĶ‘ĢŸĢ³ĢœĶ™ĢĶšĶ…ĢŸĢžĶ–ĢžĢ²Ģ¢Ķ™ĶĢ ĶŽĢžĢ«Ģ§Ķ™ĢØĢ®Ģ¦Ģ„ĢÆĢ¹ĢŸĢ¦Ģ˜Ģ®Ģ–Ģ¢nĢøĢ½Ķ›ĶĢŠĢ‚Ģ“ĢæĶĢ„ĢĢŠĢ›Ķ€Ģ€Ģ›ĶŒĢ“Ģ½ĢĶ‚Ģ›Ģ’Ģ‚ĢŒĢ„Ģ„Ķ Ķ€ĢŠĢšĢ†ĢĶ‘Ķ„ĢŠĢŠĢ•ĶŒĶ’Ķ—Ģ€ĢŽĶ„ĶĢŗĢ¤ĶŽĢ®Ķ•ĢŸĶ‡ĢžĢ™ĢžĢÆĢ¤Ģ­Ģ Ģ„Ģ°Ģ¹ĶĢ®ĶĶ™Ģ«Ģ®Ķ‰Ģ«Ģ»Ķ–Ģ”ĢœĢ­Ģ¦Ģ±ĶšĶŽĶ–Ģ§Ķ–ĢØĶ“Ģ¹sĢ“Ķ„ĶĢ…ĢšĢ‡ĢæĢ€ĢŽĢ•Ķ—ĢĶĶ—Ķ’Ģ€ĢæĢŒĢŽĶĶ›Ģ†ĢšĶ—Ķ†ĢæĶƒĢˆĶ—ĶŒĢŒĶ’Ķ’ĢšĢĶ”Ģ—Ķ–ĢĶ–Ģ«Ģ©Ģ²Ģ—ĢŖĢ¤ĢÆĢ³Ģ¼Ģ²Ģ”Ģ¼uĢøĢ‘Ģ•Ģ„Ģ†ĢĢ‰ĶĶ’ĢĢŒĢ…ĢĢŒĢŠĢ‡Ķ‘Ķ Ģ„Ģ‚Ģ•Ģ‡ĶĶŒĢĢæĶ„Ģ¾Ķ‚ĢĢ’Ķ›ĶĢĢĢšĢ‰ĢšĢĢ°Ģ„Ģ­ĶŽĶĢ²ĢŸĶĢ¹Ķ™Ģ±Ģ¦Ģ¤Ģ®ĢœĢ–Ķ•Ģ¢ĢŖĢ±Ķ…ĶœĢ¼ĢžĢœĢ–Ģ¹Ģ„Ķ…ĶœĢœĶĢĶ…mĢµĢ‚Ķ‹Ģ„Ģ€ĶĢ€Ģ”ĢæĢŠĢ¾Ģ‹ĶĢ•ĢƒĢ•Ķ†Ģ”Ģ»Ģ±Ķ…Ģ¹Ģ™Ģ­ĶšĶ”Ģ£Ģ˜ĶŽĢ¬Ģ–ĢĢ²Ģ”ĶœĶˆĢ¦Ģ±ĢØĶ“Ģ¤Ģ¤Ģ²Ģ²Ģ«Ģ«Ģ©Ķ”Ģ®Ģ»eĢøĶ›Ģ‰ĢĢ‡Ķ‡Ķ…Ģ¤Ķ”ĶˆĢ®Ģ„Ķ“Ģ¢Ģ”Ģ™Ķ“Ģ»Ķ™Ģ¹Ģ¦Ķ”Ķ…Ģ¼Ķ”