I’m relatively new to programming, I’ve been learning C on linux using nano and it’s been very fun. I’ve recently fallen into the emacs/vim rabbithole and I’ve been watching videos about emacs, Doom, spacemacs, neovim and reading comments about people switching from this or that to another config or editor, and I’ve been a bit lost on what to do. Then I realised that I haven’t done any coding and spent all of my time focusing on editors. So here is my question (which has probably been asked many times) : what is the point of investing so much time learning all of this when there are some IDEs that are preconfigured with all the functionality a programmer would need ? Does learning neovim or emacs actually save time in the long run? I know that they’re much more lightweight than IDEs and I’ve been really enjoying using the terminal much more than my time on IntelliJ, but having an easy out of the box visual debugger, refactoring and jump into functions can be really helpful in the long run I think, especially when starting to write actual large programs. Nano is fun, but not a time saver. Why did you chose your editor?

  • clushh@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    As an alternative to helix, there are lots of preconfigured/opinionated vim/neovim setups. Lunarvim (my choice), chadvim (I think is the name), and more.

    All the benefits of the vim plugins etc. With sane defaults. You still have to take time learning everything, and I would probably recommend spending time with configuring a vanilla neovin config to understand how it works then jumping into one of these later, but I’ve found it saves a lot of time configuring and gives you a fantastic starting point.

    • nous@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have tried some of these before - and they always felt a bit janky compared to something with everything built in like Helix. You still have to keep lots of plugins up to date and installation is IMO kinda dodgy on most of them - having to run some script to mess with your home directory settings. As someone that like to manage config via config managers I always found these install methods get in the way for me. And they are so complex that manually setting them up is also a huge pain.

      Where as helix just works as you would expect straight from your distros repo.

      • clushh@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s valid, especially the complexity issue. Everything mostly works, until it doesn’t. And if you have some sort of dep issue or otherwise, you’re now combing through lots of scripts to try to narrow it down and fix it unless you wait for an update.

        Personally still find I have saved a lot of time using a preconfiged setup, though everyone could have different experiences.

        • nous@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Personally still find I have saved a lot of time using a preconfiged setup

          Oh, they can save time if you want to use vim/neovim and get you into a fairly good state. But when compared to helix they still have a lot of short comings and quirky behaviour to the near 0 line of config and no extra files needing to be copied around you home dir with multiple repos being cloned down that all the vim bundles require.