Lawyers say ā€˜allegedly improperā€™ behavior by president falls within ā€˜outer perimeterā€™ of duties and is protected from prosecution

Lawyers for Donald Trump have urged a federal judge to dismiss the criminal case over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, advancing a sweeping interpretation of executive power that contends that former presidents are immune from prosecution for conduct related to their duties while in office.

The request to throw out the indictment, handed up earlier this year by a federal grand jury in Washington, amounts to the most consequential court filing in the case to date and is almost certain to precipitate a legal battle that could end up before the US supreme court.

In their 52-page submission to the presiding US district judge, Tanya Chutkan, Trumpā€™s lawyers essentially argued that Trump enjoyed absolute immunity from criminal prosecution because the charged conduct fell within the so-called ā€œouter perimeterā€ of his duties as president.

The filing contended that all of Trumpā€™s attempts to reverse his 2020 election defeat in the indictment, from pressuring his vice-president, Mike Pence, to stop the congressional certification to organizing fake slates of electors, were in his capacity as president and therefore protected.

Whether Trumpā€™s motion to dismiss succeeds remains uncertain: it raises novel legal issues, such as whether the outer perimeter test applies to criminal cases, and whether Trumpā€™s charged conduct even falls within a presidentā€™s duties.

  • bassomitron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    Except thatā€™s not what you said originally. Way to try gaslighting and changing your original argument, though. Fuck off and have a great day, Iā€™m done responding to obvious baiting.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      Except I only said trump was subject to civil suits as president which is correct.

      You really look the fool haha.

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        No, you said heā€™s only immune to criminal chargesā€¦ The first comment said, ā€œonly applies to civil cases,ā€ and you said, ā€œitā€™s actually the opposite.ā€ I proved that was not true, because he isnā€™t immune to criminal cases but he IS immune to civil cases that fall within ā€œthe outer perimeter.ā€ You then misconstrued the Stormy Daniels civil lawsuit as falling within that category, which it does not and why he lost that case.

        Iā€™m for real done responding to you.