• Steeve@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What are you arguing about exactly? Not a single comment in this chain is anti union at all, and the comment you replied to even argued for unionization where it will have the greatest benefit, i.e. all the jobs you just mentioned.

    Why are you acting like this is some sort of prisoner’s dilemma where either everyone unionizes or no one does?

      • Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nice buzzword answer, but nobody here is against your right to unionize

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And I never said anyone was. That’s something you came up with.

          All I wanted to do is remind people is that capital giving a fuck about your ass doesn’t mean that said capital is benevolent, or you shouldn’t organise, because it’s still going to fuck anyone over it can get away with fucking over. Like the cleaning staff.

          • Steeve@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The decision for tech to unionize has nothing to do with how the cleaning staff is treated

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              How can you force the bosses to pay cleaning staff properly if the engineers aren’t striking for them? There’s a gazillion desperate scabs out there and I can’t even blame them, how can you blame someone with two jobs for wanting a third to pay rent.

              …that, btw, is why the likes of the IWW organise companies and industries, and not trades.