• marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s no ISO standardized definition for variable. People use that word with all kinds of meaning.

    • drcouzelis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Waaaait a minute… isn’t it called a variable because the contents are, you know, variable?

    • Yen@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is needlessly obtuse. The definition of the word is that it’s non-constant. There isn’t an ISO definition of the word no, but there are many reputable dictionaries out there that will serve as an alternative.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, starting with the definition from algebra, where it’s not something allowed to vary…

        I guess more people know about math than use imperative programing languages.

        • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Except that’s exactly what it is allowed to in algebra.

          Sure, in most equations you solve in early algebra school there is only one possible value for the variables. But in many equations there can be multiple, or even infinite. It’s an unknown, and the contents can vary (depending on other constraints, ie. The rest of the equation(s)).

          • marcos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s no time in algebra for your variables to vary.

            When you have a non-unitary set of solutions, you have a constant non-unitary set of solutions.