Due to the severity of the situation and the fast flowing news cycle, we have decided to create a general megathread for discussion regarding the conflict.

Informal/Satirical news sources are not allowed on the main feed of the community but you are free to post them in this thread.

Please remember that all community and instance rules apply to this thread hence keep is civil.

  • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Israeli settlers need to give back the land they stole.

    Imagine what a court in your country would decide in this case:

    A man breaks into a house, kills some of the residents, and locks the rest in the basement. He then lives there and raises a family in this house. Decades later, his children still live there, and there are still prisoners in the basement, and they are routinely abused. The children obviously know all this.

    • Would the court expel the children from the house and give it back to the original owners or their descendants?
    • Would the court find the children guilty of crimes?
      • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes. You can make an argument that some of the land was legally purchased, but even at the time, this was part of a plan of colonization and ethnic cleansing, so it’s essentially property owned by a criminal enterprise or its members. Palestinians also deserve restitution for decades of oppression. So IMHO all property owned by Israel, any Zionist institution, or any Israeli found guilty of taking part in the oppression may be seized.

        • library_napper@monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The vote to create Israel included many countries, but they didn’t let the Palestinians vote. Curuoislu both Inida and Pakistan (who had recently gotten independence from Britain and had a similar psrtiton happen to them) both voted against it.

          I dont think an argument that it was legal could be made if they didn’t bother letting the people who were living there vote on it.