• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    The YouTube ad-blocker ban isn’t stupid at all.

    Something isn’t a bad business decision just because you don’t like it. That’s now how business works.

    “I won’t watch videos at all if I can’t view them without watching ads or paying money.”

    …Yeah. That’s the idea. From a business perspective people who don’t pay or view ads are leeches they’re perfectly happy to burn off.

    • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you view people as purely advertising receptacles then this business move is logical. But if you view people as agents that can build their own alternatives or advertise your services then this would seem to be a dumb business move.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you view people who actively cost you money while bringing nothing to your business as assets you’re bad at business.

        If 100% of people who used adblockers decided to stop using YouTube entirely over this, the only result would be YouTube saving money. Video hosting is simply too expensive for anyone to make a website where anyone can host and view for free without ads.

        • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          bring nothing to your business

          Well that’s the contention. Your example starts and ends with people leaving YouTube. If YouTube is the limit of consideration then yes, no value exists outside YouTube and this is a silly argument.

        • F4lcon@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          People will find alternatives. You can’t stop people witj adblockers from using YouTube by blocking adblockers - no more than you can stop piracy. People just build better, more resilient ways to bypass things. This decision has good understanding of business but not psychology.

          The only real way is to make it more convenient to use YouTube with ads, so no one goes for adblockers anyway.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They absolutely can, and I suspect the day is coming soon when they do.

            Instead of simply putting ad breaks in the video, they’ll be able to splice in a few ads to the video and re-render it to include ads each time someone clicks on the video.

      • Helluin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        most people dont take issue with the fact that there is ads but with how intrusive they are.

        • sfgifz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Idk browsing Lemmy often makes me think that many of these people expect software devs to literally work for free.

          • Auli@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            And it costs nothing to host YouTube don’t youj know. We should have a foss version and get ride of it.

            I don’t think polel realize how much bandwidth and storage YouTube uses.

            • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s called PeerTube. It’s getting more content, but anything that isn’t completely wacked out is poorly produced and there doesn’t seem to be any sort of decent search to find the rare interesting content.

              I caught the sarcasm, and don’t disagree. Just saying that a FOSS version does exist.