Remember kids, Tankies wants to undermine democracy - same as facists.

    • Robaque@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The state is needed to enforce private property, not the lack of it.

      Critically, you assume that authority is required for order, so obviously you’re unable to envision whatever it might be that anarchists are getting at.

      Sure, communism is an ideal that does not exist in practice currently, but the point of an ideal is to work towards it. The “anarcho” part specifies complete opposition to authority in praxis as well. Strategies could include unionising, community building, mutual aid, permablitzing, FOSS, copyleft, and whatever else can undermine the current power structures while maintaining anarchist principles. Which explicitly excludes Marxist-Leninist strategies of coopting the state, or forming any other kind of heirarchy.

        • Robaque@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Using the state to make private property “illegal” might be a possible strategy, but it certainly isn’t an anarchist one.

          Hypothetically, the moment that the state doesn’t exist, private property would be unenforceable/meaningless. How the state might be abolished is another question. While marxist-leninists might opt for a “trust me bro the state will dissolve once we reach true communism” strategy, anarchists again would not. Obviously it’s a tough question and an even tougher endeavour but it’s not something anarchists don’t have answers for.

          Anarchist praxis is more grassroots focused, because obviously anarchy/anarcho-communism can’t happen overnight, and requires a profound change in social values. If you choose to believe that it’s impossible, I can’t blame you, but I would like to ask why.

          Also you use private property and “property” interchangeably, but there’s a difference between personal property and private property. Abolishing private property isn’t about taking away your personal house and toothbrush, it’s about abolishing landlords, factory owners, and other “private” ownership of public/communal spaces.

          Regarding unions, it depends whether or not they’ve been structured specifically without hierarchy in mind. In any case the point is that anarchist praxis is diverse and decentralised.

        • Val@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Actually an entire state made out of democratic worker unions sounds pretty good. Although I personally would prefer no state.

            • Val@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              That is why for any such society to exist there must be a widespread cultural belief in opposing authority. All of the members of society need to call out those who try to consolidate power. The entire community must be opposed to any individual power grab. They must not be given the opportunity. That is the only way to sustain the system.