The executive order comes after a series of non-binding agreements with AI companies.

The order has eight goals: to create new standards for AI safety and security, protect privacy, advance equity and civil rights, stand up for consumers, patients, and students, support workers, promote innovation and competition, advance US leadership in AI technologies, and ensure the responsible and effective government use of the technology.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Good thing we have a guy in office who grew up without a fucking computer.

    👴🇺🇸

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I’d rather have someone who grew up with some semblance of modern technology be the one at the helm enacted policy relating to it.

        • AnonTwo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly given the outrage you’re giving in this thread I don’t feel like any regulation would make you happy, regardless of who did it.

          • foggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            …outrage?

            You got outrage from an old man emoji?

            That’s on you.

            • AnonTwo@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Outrage is doubling down when people gave completely reasonable answers to what you said.

                • AnonTwo@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Well if you’re fine with textbook answers, then you’ll be fine with people pointing out, in textbook answer, that the president has no real bearing on this since it’s not being written by him.

                  Or if you’re not fine with a textbook answer, then we can circle back to you being outraged for doubling down. Your call 👍

                  • foggy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Lol, you keep assigning an emotion to me, which you are incapable of doing. It’s adorable that you’re so persistent.

                    No, I am not outraged at anything here.

                    Hope you have a nice day 😀 🥂

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          American legislative policy affects literally every individual, business, and industry in the country. Do you expect the president to be personally experienced in IT, medicine, law, military operations, transit, construction, manufacturing, agriculture, marketing, finance, distribution, logistics, food service, sales, sports, fire service, flight, and literally every industry that exists in the United States?

        • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not even the problem. He could still make good policies, since he’s not even making them himself. The issue is that they’re apparently non-binding, which means it’s simply a worthless gesture at best.

    • nurple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You do know that Biden didn’t personally draft this himself, right?

      It delegates the specifics to agencies with relevant expertise. That’s how the executive branch works.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oh, sorry, for a minute there I thought he was the commander in chief and that the policies enacted under his supervision were to reflect on him directly

        Silly me.

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That was pretty silly. Especially given that “commander-in-chief” refers to his position in the U.S. military structure and has no bearing on his legislation and domestic policies.

        • Hereforpron2@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s a big difference between “reflecting on him” and actually being the one to write the policy. I don’t see why the former is an issue.

        • fubo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s the “unitary executive” theory, which is specifically GOP doctrine.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would be relevant if he were the one writing the policy, which he’s not.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yawn.

      There’s plenty to criticise, but this particular take is fucking moronic.

      Everyone grew up before insert current new tech.

      I grew up before cell phones, PC’s, internet, streaming, torrenting, etc, etc, and I bet a years salary I could explain all of those things in pretty good detail and many, many, many, many more than you, extemporaneously, (i.e. at the drop of a hat) , while drunk and high.

      Would you say the same about LBJ, who is THE reason we have NASA, moon landings, and all the derivative tech (including the internet you’re currently using)?

      Pick a dozen other valid reasons to criticise him, this take isn’t.

          • teft@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m basing my comment on my life experience of growing up in the 80s and 90s. Most people in the time period did not use computers. A lot of people thought they were nerdy. So someone like Joe Biden who is a “cool guy” politician almost certainly never touched one until he needed one for work. Total supposition on my part but I would put money on it.