umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-21 year agoIs BT over Tor still not recommened?blog.torproject.orgexternal-linkmessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up175arrow-down125file-text
arrow-up150arrow-down1external-linkIs BT over Tor still not recommened?blog.torproject.orgumami_wasabi@lemmy.ml to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square21fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareumami_wasabi@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down29·1 year agoCan you please elaborate more on my next post? Thanks. https://lemmy.ml/post/7508828
minus-squarerufus@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoI answered there. Not sure why you open a completely new post for that follow-up question?! You could have asked just here.
minus-squareumami_wasabi@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down17·1 year agoI thought it is better as the focus is different: one is about “Is a blog post written 13 years ago still valid today”, the other one is “If BT protocol leaks information anyways, why VPN is acceptable but other’s not.” That’s the reasoning.
Can you please elaborate more on my next post? Thanks. https://lemmy.ml/post/7508828
I answered there. Not sure why you open a completely new post for that follow-up question?! You could have asked just here.
I thought it is better as the focus is different: one is about “Is a blog post written 13 years ago still valid today”, the other one is “If BT protocol leaks information anyways, why VPN is acceptable but other’s not.” That’s the reasoning.