• bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Messaging apps are useless if the people you want to message don’t have the same one.

    • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are many countries where WhatsApp has become the defacto messaging standard. It’s really hard and isolating to refuse to use it there.

    • tiramichu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The people closest to me in my life I have converted to using Signal, but I have family and friends who use WhatsApp, who also have in turn their own family and friends who use it, and so-on down the line.

      Ditching WhatsApp myself would mean not being part of those groups, and I can’t convince thirty people at once to all ditch a platform they are perfectly happy with (even if I don’t think they should be happy with it) and has huge lock-in because everyone else in their lives also uses it.

      I honestly hope that Meta cram it to the brim with ads, because if it gets shitty enough then maybe the alternatives will look more appetising.

    • InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its the default in most of the world, there is no moving anyone to Signal since WA is just enough for most of the population and basically have the exact same features. Telegram has a bit of an audience but its only because its more like a social media/chat app hybrid.

      A good chunk of the world also runs on low end phones and having an extra chat app to chat with maybe 1 person at best is a waste of space to most.

        • InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It got steam because it was one of the first ways to technically “chat for free” even if it had a price tag at first. Most countries had unlimited data but still billed people for every sms sent. Whatsapp introduced the concept of an app solely to chat with others through their phones for free/a one time fee forever.

          By now it has reached critical mass and its basically impossible to get people to migrate anywhere else. Everyone would have to change apps at the same time.

          People don’t really see any particular appeal in WA, its just the default now even if its just meh. Sadly.

        • tiramichu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In the US Apple had an early lead with the iPhone and so a lot of people converted from SMS to iMessage.

          In the EU the iPhone didn’t have the same adoption, so when WhatsApp came along most people were still communicating with SMS, so it was WhatsApp which captured the market instead.

    • Taalen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Critical mass. When it has been the default way to message anyone and everyone for over a decade, it’s pretty difficult to start converting everyone and their literal grandmother to start adopting something else. I understand it doesn’t enjoy quite the same status in the US though.

    • soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, I couldn’t get my dad to use signal. And personally I think that signal is lacking in a lot of features like a smartwatch app, ability to send messages through a voice assistant, among other things because of the fact it prioritizes security and privacy over everything else.

      WhatsApp just recently got an app for Wear OS