• farqueue2@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I read it as they were split 3-2 on whether VAR should have intervened. It’s not clear what the split was on the actual incident itself

    • IsleofManc@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Surely a vote for VAR not to intervene is the same as a vote saying it isn’t a red card

      • SOAR21@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s not how anything works. Lots of legal cases are dismissed or lost on pure procedure and not the actual objective truth.

        Process is a part of justice as well.

    • pleaseexcusemethanks@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      That doesn’t make it any better lol. How could anybody think that VAR shouldn’t intervene? It’s violent conduct pure and simple. Semantics aren’t going to change that.