Not really sure what to put here…I usually put relevant excerpts, but that got this post deleted for doing that

    • mycorrhiza they/them@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      houses and cars are inanimate objects.

      Juries acquited these activists of theft in previous cases, because they were shown footage of the awful condition the stolen animals were in. Which was why, in this case, the prosecutors dropped the theft charges, put a gag order on the footage, and instead threw a “felony conspiracy to commit trespassing” charge at the leader of the group, who didn’t even participate directly in stealing the animals.

    • Emerald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sentient beings are not houses or cars. If parents abuse their babies, they will get them taken from them. Same should apply to animals.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If parents abuse their babies, they will get them taken from them.

        By the state after a detailed legal process, not some rando off the street after a beer.

        • Emerald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But with animals, the state won’t help them. If a baby was being tortured and the state wouldn’t save it, how could you blame someone for taking it into their own hands?