Title says it all (i have turned on 165hz on settings). Its a cheap monitor, do some 165hz monitors not truly give you that experience? Or are my eyes fucked

  • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    Humans can see a single solid color frame changing at 1000 fps. So if you don’t notice a difference between 60 and 165 fps something isn’t working. It’s not your eyes.

    • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      Seeing a solid color frame change is completely different from the minor changes generally occurring per frame, especially in media such as movies and games which are continuous.

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        The Hobbit movies at 48 instead of 24 fps still looked much smoother and better.

        • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I vastly preferred them in 24 fps, they looked awful in 48 fps to me.

    • Turun@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Your usecase may be different, but I am usually not required to catch solid color frames in my day to day computer use.