• shastaxc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 年前

    EVs also have the ability to live longer. If an average EV is usable for twice as long as an ICE vehicle, its carbon footprint from manufacturing is already down to 50%.

    • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 年前

      So can transit vehicles, in fact they last even longer so I don’t see this as an advantage for EVs. In Vancouver, Canada for example, there are fully self-driving electric trains from the 80s that are still running perfectly fine today, and the only reason they’re getting scrapped soon is because they’re loud and uncomfortable compared to newer trains, which even then I personally don’t like the transit agency’s decision to scrap them because that’s super wasteful, they could probably run another 40 years with good maintenance.

      • shastaxc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 年前

        Alright well that’s good. When the US shrinks down to the size of Vancouver maybe that will be a good option.

        • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 年前

          The US has in fact shrunk down to the size of Europe which has excellent public transportation.

        • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 年前

          US can’t have good transit because it’s so much bigger than a single city.

          The US doesn’t have cities the size of Vancouver, or municipal governments that can solve transit locally.

          The country is simply to big for that.