In his statements the US billionaire “proposes to allow Russia to commit crimes
against Ukrainians”, Mikhail Podolyak, advisor to the head of the Office of the
President, wrote on social media. “When someone who sits comfortably thousands
of kilometres away from war and importantly argues about other people’s fates
suggests that Ukraine should agree to “negotiations/capitulation” after 600+
days of bloody genocide, he is really suggesting that Russia should be allowed
to continue committing crimes, slaughtering civilians, killing global rules.
Until the world finally chokes on democratic blood and recognises tyrants as
global leaders,” the politician believes. American billionaire Elon Musk has
called on the world to sympathize with the Russian occupiers, because “they were
not forced to be on the front line”, adding that Ukraine should stop resisting
the Russian Federation. He “advised” Volodymyr Zelenskyy to abandon the
counteroffensive and agree to peace talks with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin.
Musk made his remarks in an interview with US blogger of European origin Lex
Fridman, who does not condemn the war of the Russian Federation. You can read
about it here:
https://www.txtreport.com/news/2023-11-11-“we-must-sympathize-with-the-russian-guys”--musk-“advised”-zelensky-to-meet-with-putin.Hklj17fTm6.html
[https://www.txtreport.com/news/2023-11-11-%22we-must-sympathize-with-the-russian-guys%22--musk-%22advised%22-zelensky-to-meet-with-putin.Hklj17fTm6.html]
Quote from the author of the book this claim originated from:
To clarify on the Starlink issue: the Ukrainians THOUGHT coverage was enabled all the way to Crimea, but it was not. They asked Musk to enable it for their drone sub attack on the Russian fleet. Musk did not enable it, because he thought, probably correctly, that would cause a major war.
45 people upvoting misinformation.
Quote from the author of the book this claim originated from:
Source
Starlink was totally fine with being used for defensive purposes. Is recovering Russia occupied Crimea not a defensive act?
Also that war was already raging on.
Also I wasn’t quoting any book. I was online when this shit happened. Preventing a drone strike against a Russian naval fleet in the black sea.
Your claim was that he disabled it. He did not disable it. It was not enabled in the first place. Enabling it would be against US sanctions to Russia.