alt text

A cartoon depicts a chasm with a rope bridge, once connecting both sides, cut and hanging from the side of the cliff, sabotaged by a suit standing on the well forested right side beside a spool of rope and holding a saw. The left side of the chasm is a wasteland of sawn tree stumps. There’s a sign that reads “Please return saw and rope when done”. An empty box sits beneath the sign. The suit calls out to a person in the wasteland on the left side of the chasm “BUILD YOUR OWN DAMN BRIDGE LIKE I DID!” The person in the wasteland replies “WITH WHAT?! “

Caption: Capitalism at its finest

h/t to @[email protected]

  • Dkarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No the most efficient use is the government building the bridge because they can do it most cost efficiently when they already have to build 1000 bridges.

    It also works for health care. Socialism works.

    • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Government costs a lot of extra money, even when the scope is just building a 1000 bridges. That’s not cost efficient at all.

      The capitalist alternative is worse though, because the cost for using it will be higher, even if the cost for making was lower.

            • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Every country does. Every country doesn’t need to be building bridges constantly though, there’s only so many rivers. It’s inefficient.

              Better to contract that out via competitive tenders to specialist bridge builders.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Infrastructure needs to be constantly maintained and rebuilt. Do you think once someone builds a bridge, it’s fine and no one ever needs to replace it? Or that a river needs a new crossing somewhere else?

                • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  No, that’d be a stupid thing to think.

                  People who maintain bridges are not the same as those who build them though.

                  If your bridges constantly need rebuilding, you’re not building very good bridges.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Sorry, you think two different groups of construction crews exist and one builds bridges and the other maintains bridges? And you also think that, when even small countries have hundreds of bridges, they don’t need to be rebuilt on a regular basis?