and no one irl even has the decency to agree with me because it’s so fucking drilled into the culture that these fucking BuNsInNesSes have a Right to do this because it’s a bSUsniEss. like oh yeah they have an office building so they definitely get to analyze my piss because they say they want to. sick fucking freaks.

preaching to the choir a bit on lemmy (or i would hope so at least) but still

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Random tests could be fairer and avoid discrimination or prejudicial testing.

      • Aermis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        My union pays you $100 if you get hit with a random. They’re also the ones who issue them. Not my employer

        • Madlaine@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unless your idea is to use a daily meeting where a d100 is rolled ro determines who is tested today in front of everyone you cannot really rule out any suspicion for bias.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You just came up with a single super simple way to do it. I’m sure there’s loads of other solutions that offer similar sort of randomness with more convenience.

            And remember, we’re comparing this to people asking to be tested on a hunch. Do you not think these randomness measures are better for fighting bias and discrimination, or is the issue that you can’t have 100% always free of bias randomness?