• NewPerspective@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    To be fair, this sounds like a poorly written law. A photo or video can look like association but even more important is that nobody knows the full contents of somebody else’s brain. This person I’ve never met before, are they a Nazi? What if today they’re normal but they spend too much time on YouTube? If they’re a Nazi tomorrow then what?

    Not that they’d vote yes on a better written law, but still…

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s what I was trying to understand from the article. They cannot even give themselves proper standards for their party. They are truly disgusting.

    • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah I have to agree. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Banning anything based on on the thoughts and opinions in someone’s head feels a little too much like thought police to me.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        As rules for their own party? The GOP seems just fine with excommunicating Liz Cheney for upholding the rule of law, even if she agrees 100% with the platform, but they cannot keep Nazis out of their party? Weird.