Stamets@startrek.website to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish · 1 year agoClear differencestartrek.websiteimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1327arrow-down13
arrow-up1324arrow-down1imageClear differencestartrek.websiteStamets@startrek.website to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareJohnhones@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoIt’s a fin on the top, for aerodynamics
minus-squareZectivi@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoI may not be a smart person, but aerodynamics… in space?
minus-squareUmmdustry@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 year agoform drag is proportional to: The denisty of the medium. The velocity of the moving body (squared). Interstellar space might be very undense, peaking at about 10^-15 kg/m^3… However the enterprise E is very fast, with warp 9.9 being approx 20,000 c or 6 * 10^13 m/s, and that matters twice as much This puts the overall cosmodymanic forces at Cd * 3.6 * 10^12 N/m^2 or approximately the same as experienced by a Sandworm going mach 30. So sure why not, Einstein and Newton are dead so can’t complain, and I’m pretty sure I could beat up Bill Nye.
minus-squareZectivi@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 year agoI have no grounds to question anything that you said, but all I can imagine is this image.
It’s a fin on the top, for aerodynamics
I may not be a smart person, but aerodynamics… in space?
form drag is proportional to:
Interstellar space might be very undense, peaking at about 10^-15 kg/m^3…
However the enterprise E is very fast, with warp 9.9 being approx 20,000 c or 6 * 10^13 m/s, and that matters twice as much
This puts the overall cosmodymanic forces at Cd * 3.6 * 10^12 N/m^2 or approximately the same as experienced by a Sandworm going mach 30.
So sure why not, Einstein and Newton are dead so can’t complain, and I’m pretty sure I could beat up Bill Nye.
I have no grounds to question anything that you said, but all I can imagine is this image.