• ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get where you’re coming from, but there is significant maintenance required. Cables and equipment break or need upgrading, routes get changed, loads change over time in different areas due to population and service movement…

      • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not talking about exchange to premises, this is between ISPs and whoever is routing between cities and countries. Customers get charged for maintenance between the ISP and their house, but there’s the whole internet backbone that ISPs hook into that requires maintenance.

        • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The online services pay their ISPs.

          This is shameless double-dipping by entrenched monopolists.

        • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Customers get charged for maintenance between the ISP and their house

          They really don’t, customers get charged what they need to be charged to support the network, not just the last mile to your house. Companies don’t get internet connectivity for free, either, paying significantly more than consumers at every turn

    • arin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah i know, but if one location changes over 10x others, you know that one location is a problem and not the lack funding to infrastructure. Also south Korea was known to have better than American Internet at lower cost back in the day, it’s probably a corporation profit thing forcing higher fees