‘Nudify’ Apps That Use AI to ‘Undress’ Women in Photos Are Soaring in Popularity::It’s part of a worrying trend of non-consensual “deepfake” pornography being developed and distributed because of advances in artificial intelligence.

  • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    We’re talking specifically about AI enhanced fakes, not the old school Photoshop fakes – they’re two completely different beasts

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Different only in construction. Why they exist and what they are is older than photography.

      • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        No I disagree because before you could tell a fake from a mile away, but deepfakes bring it to a whole new level of creepy because they can be EXTREMELY convincing

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            The difference is that we now can do video. I mean in principle that was possible before but also a hell of a lot of work. Making it look real hasn’t been a problem since before Photoshop, if anything people get sloppy with AI also because a felt 99% of people who use AI don’t have an artistic bone in their body.

          • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m not saying that it’s a shift in nature? All I’ve been saying is:

            A) tools to create realistic nudes have been publicly available ever since deepfakes became a thing

            B) deepfakes are worse than traditional photoshopped nudes because (as you put it, a quality improvement) they’re more convincing and therefore can have more detrimental effects

          • Delta_V@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Or maybe an accessibility improvement. You don’t need to practice creating your own works of art over many years anymore, or have enough money to commission a master artist. The AI artists are good enough and work for cheap.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          There was a brief period between now and the invention of photography when that was true. For thousands of years before that it was possible to create a visual representation of anything you imagine without any hint that it wasn’t something real. Makes me wonder if there were similar controversies about drawings or paintings.