Starlink loses out on $886 million in rural broadband subsidies::The FCC reaffirmed a decision not to award Starlink a nearly $900 million subsidy for offering 100Mbps/20Mbps low-latency internet service in 35 states.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t think you quite understand just how remote some people are. Besides, Starlink is also being used on vessels and aircraft, good luck getting copper out to them.

    Also, fibre optic is how the cool people Internet these days.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t think you understand that a lot of copper is still less than infinite rockets forever

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is the kind of dumb statement that really gives this platform a bad name. I know people who were quoted a six figure sum to get mains power to their property, fibre would have been a similar cost. And this is people who are at a fixed location, we also have those who are mobile to consider.

        There are people for whom a wired connection to anything is out of the question.

        • alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The issue with starlink is the choice to be in LEO instead of using geosats. It lowers the latency but it makes the whole project completely unsustainable.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            I suspect they’ll eventually move to a slightly higher orbit, where their satellites can last a decade or so, once the technology is more mature.

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Ships don’t need infinite rockets full of infinite cell towers launched forever.

          Maybe when we have fusion power and don’t have to waste the resources. We don’t. We have to choose what we want to use. I say that launching infinite rockets with infinite cell towers forever is not worth being able to watch tiktok in the middle of the Atlantic.

          There’s always actual satellite internet for the needed communications.

          Maybe we should just wait for the subsidies and the investor money that’s actually paying for starlink to run out and see where things quite literally fall.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            infinite rockets full of infinite cell towers

            They need 12,000 of them, which isn’t a huge amount considering you’re covering the entire globe.

            • echo64@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Per year, forever. Hence infinite rockets with infinite cell towers.

              • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                The typical lifespan is 5-7 years, so 2400 per year at worst.

                You don’t really do math, do you?

                • echo64@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  It’s one year. Their goal is 5 years, but it’s one year because they haven’t hit their goal. Starlink hasn’t even been active for five years yet. This is embarrassing for you.