I feel like this describes me a lot but I also feel like it gives me a broad and eclectic knowledgebase that my employment has nothing to do with and has no mutual relevance to

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.mlEnglish
    311·
    11 months ago

    Reject productivity fetishism, whether it comes from capitalist ideology or the Protestant work ethic or wherever.

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
      62·
      11 months ago

      Oh do I ever hate that Protestant bullshit. I doth Protest Protestantism, why is such an assholey whole concept or ethos?! So many destroyed lives and deaths for a ridiculous religious way of saying fuck anybody not born into or lucky with money

      Edit: Producstant

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    24·
    11 months ago

    Absolutely not.

    Dilettante gets used as an insult when someone wants to discredit the position of another for having insufficient dedication, credentials, or experience. People who really know what they’re talking about address positions directly rather than the person who holds them.

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
      61·
      11 months ago

      That always triggers me to like wanna annihilate them with my [f]actual bona fides like, hey what about

      • x
      • y
      • z

      Aha. I would never bring up credentials cuz its just silly to be like “respect muh authoriteh”

  • Shurimal@kbin.social
    11·
    11 months ago

    A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.

    —Robert A. Heinlein

    • CallumWells@lemmy.mlEnglish
      1·
      11 months ago

      Except dilettante and generalist aren’t synonyms. A generalist will have a broad base of things they’ll want to have some actual knowledge in, a dilettante (yes, it only has one l) wouldn’t necessarily have more than one area they have a superficial interest in.

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
      2·
      11 months ago

      I feel like ya thats how I would best articulate like “my competetive advantage” even tho I don’t give a shit about competing or any, like, hierarchy…

  • Shambling Shapes@lemmy.oneEnglish
    8·
    11 months ago

    No, not a bad thing. Makes for a good pub trivia teammate.

    Only a negative if it keeps a person from being able to focus on their job. But that’s beyond just being a dilettante, that’s unmanaged ADHD or something.

  • rufus@discuss.tchncs.de
    6·
    11 months ago

    Depends on the job. It is quite alright to be a generalist and have a broad understanding of everything. It allows you to connect different fields, come up with simple fixes for nearly everything and call for an expert if it’s beyond your perspective. Apart from that there are jobs that don’t require knowledge. Maybe instead strength, patience and dedication or empathy.

    The dangerous part is if you don’t know your limits. If you’re a dilettante and then start opening the panel from the circuit breakers and mess with the wires, you will probably burn down your house.

    So it depends. Always? No.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    2·
    11 months ago

    I had a professor who when talking about a PhD would talk about the need for breath and depth. Im a generalist and I find I have as much depth as I need to get things done. Then I move on to another hole.