• TerryCustard@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Contains racial slurs which are a realistic portrayal of how people would talk at the time it is set, but which are difficult for the students to hear repeated in a classroom setting, regardless of context

    • theory@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Theres only so much you can coddle students though, before its just a bit silly

      • Granary@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d agree with that. It’s probably a positive thing for children to be exposed to that sort of language in a controlled environment where the teacher can explain historical context. It’s not like they’ll be avoid racial slurs forever

        • charlytune@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are you talking about white kids, or black kids though? I think the issue is that black kids unfortunately will hear that language anyway, as the targets of it, and that hearing it read out in the classroom is going to be a very different experience for them.

          • Sens@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If they also studied a book that contained racist terms for white people, then it would be fair in that context.

            However are there any racial slurs for white people that are as offensive as it is for black people? I don’t honestly think so.

            Societies moving on, time to drop off mice and men from the syllabus and educate as to why it was removed in a different classroom setting.