• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The winner of the Primary being supported by the Party is how it is supposed to work

    Agreed.

    Unfortunately the party has that backwards, and a judge agreed with them.

    The winner of the primary is whoever they want it to be. They can influence as much as they want, because at the end of a day it doesn’t even matter who wins the primary. Legally a bunch of unelected donor connected people can name whoever they want.

    But I don’t think I want to get roped in a conversation with you based on your post history

    • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      False. While they may wield undue influence, there is nothing remotely “rigged” about it.

      My post history is one of treating folks as they treat me. I understand why you don’t wish to have a conversation as you’ve not a leg to stand on, but the only person that could possibly rope you into one is you.