• undercrust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      Political leader of the country pointing out his main critic’s crass hypocrisy, but yeah

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        What has the Trudeau administration done anyway against food inflation in Canada?

        • undercrust@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          You’re right, what HAS the Trudeau government done about something it has nothing to do with?!?

          AND WHY HAVEN’T THEY DONE IT YET?!?

          Look into dairy controls and egg quotas. Shit we even had the Canadian Wheat Board until 2015. Price controls in Canada have been in place for decades.

          Government doesn’t gouge you for profits; Loblaws, Metro, Empire, and other for-profit grocery companies do. Hell, the Loblaws/Weston cartel secretly fixed high prices for bread for years, gouging consumers to line their pockets.

          Unless you’re suggesting that the entire food production chain and grocery stores are nationalized, there’s pretty much sweet fuck all the government CAN do. If you’re going to throw blame around, at least educate yourself about what causes inflation first and blame the right people. Otherwise it’s just a shrill straw man argument.

          • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Uh how about they break up the dairy and egg cartels and abolish quotas so there can be some real fucking competition.

            You literally listed dairy quotas in your comment as if it’s a good thing. It’s anti competitive, plain and simple, and guess who has the jurisdiction to deal with anti competitive business practices on a national scale.

            • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Conservatives would be even less likely to abolish the quotas. Their main voters are farmers, which benefit the most without having to compete as much.

            • undercrust@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Oh, totally it’s anti-competitive, and I don’t disagree with you, but we were talking anti-inflationary / price stability measures. It’s not a good solution (we regularly pay more for milk and eggs), but it does keep the price from jumping around, and for-profit companies from price gouging.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Do that and we’ll instead have to subsidize the industry like it’s done elsewhere. We’ll also see the rise of even bigger producers that will buy smaller producers and a huge increase in the waste of dairy products and eggs. Prices would start fluctuating a lot more instead of being fairly stable compared to most things found in groceries.

              Stop blaming the government (especially the federal one as it has less power over things that affect the population directly) and start looking at the profits made by grocery stores, that’s where you’ll find your money.

          • TotallyHuman@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Corporations serve society, not visa versa. If lighter measures do not work, nationalize 'em all. (Many lighter measures have not yet been tried.)

            PP would be worse, though.

            • karlhungus@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              10 months ago

              In my experience corporations serve their shareholders (and maybe board and executive s).

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Their point is that it’s the corporations job to serve society, not the contrary, and if they don’t do their job (like you said) they should be nationalized.

                • karlhungus@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  We might live better if this were true (maybe not), but it is not at all their job. Neither is it our job to serve them.