CynAq
- 0 Posts
- 49 Comments
Right? Both the Israeli and Qatari governments suck ass
CynAq@kbin.socialto Gaming@beehaw.org•Doing things in games because it simple felt good.3·2 years agoI want to play that so bad right now. The cat like movement with wall-climb, plus the alien vision is easily one of my top 5 unique gaming experiences.
CynAq@kbin.socialto Blahaj Lemmy Meta@lemmy.blahaj.zone•Both of these removals are tacit endorsement of ableism and racism and this mod should be removed.5·2 years agoI agree with you.
I think if an attraction leads to the objectification of your “type”, it’s problematic regardless of what that type is. If you just have a preference and you handle your interactions with people with the necessary respect everyone deserves, I can’t see a problem with it.
CynAq@kbin.socialto World News@lemmy.world•300,000-year-old skull found in China unlike any early human seen before271·2 years agoHua long dong 6 is a hell of a name tho
What is that, unholy water?
CynAq@kbin.socialto Privacy@lemmy.ml•PSA: Intel Graphics Drivers Now Collect Telemetry By Default122·2 years agothere’s always that one bootlicker
Humans can do something, doesn’t mean humans only do that thing and nothing else.
Humans have many models of the world running in different modes in parallel, enabling us to make sense of things other than just process language and come up with plausible sounding answers within the rules of a given language.
Our understanding of concepts is different than how we process language, demonstrated in that there are perfectly intelligent people who can’t communicate using spoken or written language (including sign language) but can do so using other methods which demonstrate language processing isn’t essential to our intelligence.
The way we learn information and integrate it into our neural network is vastly different than how we train our artificial models using machine learning. Even if we just take language processing, we definitely don’t learn by reading the entirety of written human language many times over regardless of what language it’s written in, until we can understand how it’s underlying mechanics work so that we can form plausible structures of word-chunk strings without necessarily understanding the concepts behind the word-chunks.
That sounds nothing like a human.
LLMs are “generate something that sounds like it would answer the prompt” machines. Nothing more and nothing less.
Through that lens, they are a lot less impressive, a lot less frustrating and also a lot more fun.
deleted by creator
CynAq@kbin.socialto Reddit@lemmy.world•Sound Off: How many 10+ year redditors have left the site?2·2 years agoDitto for 12 yrs. No porn account either. Quit cold turkey.
Xitting, pronounced “shitting”
CynAq@kbin.socialto World News@lemmy.world•This month is the planet's hottest on record by far – and hottest in around 120,000 years, scientists say | CNN201·2 years agoI, too, agree with the scientists that we’re all well and truly fucked.
CynAq@kbin.socialto politics @lemmy.world•Supreme Court Ethics Bill Passes Committee over 100% Republican Opposition1·2 years agoYes. That’s why who said what, and in what context, matters.
CynAq@kbin.socialto politics @lemmy.world•Supreme Court Ethics Bill Passes Committee over 100% Republican Opposition83·2 years agoYou’re misunderstanding NYT’s position and intention on this when they call it “strict new ethics rules”. They are a neoliberal organization who’ll side with republicans more often than they do with progressives. They are trying to paint it in a bad, big government kinda sentiment when they call it “strict”.
Or conversely, a Christian apologist coming to an atheist community and saying “if god isn’t real why do good things” as if declaring you are a poorly educated sociopath is a good way to challenge people’s well formed ideas.
I’ve spent quite a bit of time trying to explain to some people why “woke leftists” are so quick to shut them up that they feel like they aren’t given a right to speak their minds. “Woke” ideas are generally more developed and complex than “common sense” ideas, which requires some thought being put into them while they evolve from basic to their current level, so when you challenge a person’s developed idea with a superficial, usually knee jerk level question or critique, you’re most likely engaging in a line of thinking they were done with quite early in their evolution of the idea you’re trying to challenge.
CynAq@kbin.socialto You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK: If you find an interesting topic/rabbit hole, you can get some real engagement here if you share it. It doesn't get drowned out like elsewhere.161·2 years agoYSK it’s a lot. Alot is a fictional character created to illustrate this point.
CynAq@kbin.socialto You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK: There's a history of animals being charged for criminal acts2·2 years agoEven orange Cheetos can be charged with criminal acts sometimes!
I can’t believe in this day and age marijuana is still an object of political influence.
Just legalize the shit, period. What’s with all the conditionals attached to it? You just have to marginalize users one way or the other because god forbid we have fewer things “those people” do to point fingers at.