5·
8 hours agoThat’s the plan right, that’s part of Project 2025, to instantiate Unitary Executive Theory to make everything they do legal regardless of courts and impeachment trials.
- 0 Posts
- 190 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
Cake day: May 19th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Biden should now officially order those judges executed. Put in place a law that the supreme court must contain an even split of representatives from both/all major parties.
Then install judges who will reverse the immunity law… Meaning this problem will not come up again.
EDIT: Upon reflection, maybe they just reaffirmed the presumption of innocence for someone who’s job it is to sometimes order the deaths of people. So he has “The presumption of immunity” until determined by a court case, or impeachment hearing? Is that what’s going on?
2·13 hours agoHonestly, the quickest way out is to officially order the summary executions of the judges who established this new immunity - then pass a second law ordering that SCOTUS must always evenly represent all major parties, one out, one in.
Then get new judges in that will reverse the immunity ruling. That way this sort of problem won’t come up again.
Sometimes the tree of liberty needs to be watered with blood. This is may be one of those times.
Biden should just pass an official law that SCOTUS must be evenly split between major parties.
This couldn’t be illegal to do anymore, as Biden will be immune, as it’ll be an official act.
Hot take (not entirely serious):
Now that Presidents can’t be prosecuted for official acts that are crimes, Biden should enact Project 2025 EARLY give himself unitary executive power, and refuse to leave office.
This would either destroy the country, save the country, or force SCOTUS to reconsider their ruling.
Of course he could just deem the imbalance on SCOTUS a threat to national security, and write an official law saying that all major parties must be equally repressented by the judges on there (a one out, one in law).
That would also work, and run less risk of tearing the country apart.
The palm tree would seem to indicate the sand of the island is capable of filtering the salt water to some level …best use the turtle world to dog for fresh water.
… possibly building a shade wall with the sand excavated. Then just pray for coconuts and fish…
Actually maybe you can build a cove to lure and catch fish in.
Nope nope, it’s a cartoon, I have to stop thinking about this.
EDIT: Oh yeah, build a cove to lure fish into, then wall it off and dump sand in it until it’s dry… Fish caught.
Her father was an Anthropologist, where as she seems to be more of a Sociologist.
They need more Bernies Sanders, AOCs… And that katie person… I forget their last name.
No, not at all, people can get tattoos for whatever reasons they want. I guess was just having an open wonder what those reasons are.
I forgot they were a they/them. Theys usually have reasons for what they dp, I wonder what they are.
Do you think any of those pictures hold a special or significant meaning for her?
Do you think those particular images are important for her to have at hand?
Yep, car batteries are mostly recyclable.
Probably watch youtube because the mass media has been captured by Capitalism and its political forces.
62·3 days agoThat younger boy has the right idea, giving a bit of a wave.
7·3 days agoWhat if Dutch and Norwegian dikes and canals were combined with Hong Kong style architecture - but everyone had British, Irish and Scottish citizenships
[EDIT: My misspelling was ghhheeeey]
2·3 days agoSo you’re arguing that misinformation is fair if a campaign has done anything that can be remotely described as damaging (and you refuse to say what they did that was so damaging).
How could Russia harm them by leaking details of things that are not illegal and therefore (purportedly) entirely acceptable?
By including disinformation? It’s a pretty basic concepts, by lying.
From the Guccifer 2.0 Wikipedia page:
Some of the documents “Guccifer 2.0” released to the media appear to be forgeries cobbled together from public information and previous hacks, which had been mixed with disinformation.[9][10][11]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer_2.0
I’m not sure why so many people are reacting like this to my comments. The Republican Senate Committee was able to accept there was a Russian disinfo campaign, not sure why Lemmy thinks that’s all fine and dandy.
What DNC corruption exactly are you referring to?
The corruption of the electronic was done by Russia and the RNC accepting and not reporting foreign election interference. As per:
From the Guccifer 2.0 Wikipedia page:
Some of the documents “Guccifer 2.0” released to the media appear to be forgeries cobbled together from public information and previous hacks, which had been mixed with disinformation.[9][10][11]
From the Guccifer 2.0 Wikipedia page:
Some of the documents “Guccifer 2.0” released to the media appear to be forgeries cobbled together from public information and previous hacks, which had been mixed with disinformation.[9][10][11]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer_2.0
Could you show what specifically was fake?
I’m not an intelligence agent, so no, I can’t tell you what was and wasn’t faked. You would have to look into the various reports and intelligence findings yourself for that info.
From the Guccifer 2.0 Wikipedia page:
Some of the documents “Guccifer 2.0” released to the media appear to be forgeries cobbled together from public information and previous hacks, which had been mixed with disinformation.[9][10][11]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer_2.0
I never said anything about the technical details. I said the majority of the content was made up from information already released.
But yeah sure buddy, I’m sure the Senate Intelligence Committee got it wrong /s
Maybe do basic research before you go after someone for something they didn’t discuss. That way you won’t be left looking like an idiot.
There was Russian interference whether you want to believe it or not. I’ll let you go back to your qanon discussion group now.
So in your opinion, did they just reaffirm something like the presumption of innocence but it’s tailored for someone who’s job it is to sometimes order the deaths of people? So he has “The presumption of immunity” when making otherwise illegal orders, until it’s otherwise determined by a court case, or impeachment hearing? Is that what’s going on?