Fediverse Advocate

  • 97 Posts
  • 4.5K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2023

help-circle


  • Ballywatticock is a contender. Shitterton is funny because it literally means what you think it means as it was next to an open sewer. When I was younger I thought Ballybogey was hilarious.

    Technically you could count “Derry/Londonderry” as a de facto placename as a whole by how it’s used, even though it is technically two names of the same place side by side. But I realised how bizarre it is for people who don’t know about the history of it, and come into a bus or a train station and hear an announcement for “Derry-London-Derry” or see “Londonderry Derry” on Google Maps.

    Another one I like is Torpenhow Hill. Basically Tor means hill. Then someone invaded and the name changed, saw a hill at Tor and called it Tor Pen, which also means hill. Then another group comes along and adds their word for Hill as “How”, and then finally we see the hill and add the word “Hill”

    Lisburn is another contender. While most places with “burn” in the name refers to a river, Lisburn is named that way because it’s the rebuilt part of Lisnagarvey that burned down. There’s even a phoenix in the armorial achievement.






  • So you’re saying that God should have cancelled His plans because a dude made a stupid vow?

    The girl also didn’t seem to protest too much. In fact, she appeared to encourage him. She asked for two weeks up a mountain. It would have been ample time to run away. She didn’t.

    Judges 11:36-40

    And she said to him, “My father, you have opened your mouth to the Lord; do to me according to what has gone out of your mouth, now that the Lord has avenged you on your enemies, on the Ammonites.” So she said to her father, “Let this thing be done for me: leave me alone two months, that I may go up and down on the mountains and weep for my virginity, I and my companions.” So he said, “Go.” Then he sent her away for two months, and she departed, she and her companions, and wept for her virginity on the mountains. And at the end of two months, she returned to her father, who did with her according to his vow that he had made. She had never known a man, and it became a custom in Israel that the daughters of Israel went year by year to lament the daughter of Jephthah the Gileadite four days in the year.

    If you were given an eternity in paradise, why would you waste it thinking about one event back on earth? Some people die worse deaths. And why would you be pissed at God for not making your crappy life a thousand years ago slightly less crappy? You don’t have trauma in Heaven.

    Revelation 21:3-4

    And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, “Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God. He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away.”

    His daughter didn’t even worry about dying that much- she was more upset that she didn’t have the chance to have offspring. Even she knew that eternity was better than what she had here.





  • It’s ridiculous. And I’m someone talking from a Protestant/Unionist background from Belfast.

    Basically, Kneecap has had provocative music which hits at home about distrusting police, burning police vehicles, dressing in PIRA attire. The PIRA is a very real terrorist organisation at home. One could argue that kneecap could be directly or indirectly encouraging terrorist activity at home or inspiring people to follow in the PIRA’s footsteps via attitude. They also advocated for killing MPs.

    But somehow, the line is crossed when they display a flag of a foreign terrorist organisation halfway across the world.

    So the way the law is acting, it’s as if Kneecap is more likely to inspire Hezbollah to cause a terrorist attack instead of an Irish dissident at home. Which I think everyone can agree is ridiculous conclusion to make. But that’s the conclusion the law has seemed to made. Basically, something is up.

    Now, I’m not saying they should be prosecuted for their other material either. I’m just saying that this whole thing doesn’t make sense that the line is crossed on a foreign terrorist movement not relevant to us.

    Something is up.


  • He was a volunteer firefighter. I reckon he was benefit to society. I wouldn’t cheer a death lightly.

    Another thing is, people can be indoctrinated/misled into supporting Trump. I find a lot of passive supporters or believers in conspiracy theories seem to be moreso victims. Trump can pay lip service to Corey, but we all know that deep down, he is glad it was Corey and not him. Another case is Ashli Babbitt. I think it’s a tragedy that she was misled, groomed and indoctrinated into storming the United States parliament building, but her shooting was still justified. She was part of a mob that was going after Mike Pence. She was possibly led to believe that what she was doing was fighting for her country. But it was still a tragedy that she was there and not at home with her family, even though the killing was necessary, given the circumstances.

    Personally, I wouldn’t condemn people celebrating the deaths of the likes of Trump, Putin or Netanyahu if they were shot. In fact, I would probably be happy myself - especially if Putin.

    I also don’t think the execution of your CEO guy by Luigi was unjustified either, and don’t have a problem with people celebrating that. But these are people in power directly responsible for making the world worse. You can be indirectly responsible for making the world worse and not know it. Such as misled voters (I used to be misled into thinking Brexit was a good thing)

    Even when it comes to power, for example, I wouldn’t celebrate the death of Lis Truss. She was stupid, but not malicious enough.


  • I don’t like them and completely disagree with what they did and everything they do, but to charge someone for a “terror offence” for a flag is stupid. Just because I hate what they stand for doesn’t mean that they should be charged with a terror offence for it.

    Also, their thing is literally dressing up in PIRA getup, once they depicted a burning police vehicle. Things that are more realistic and definitely close to home in west Belfast, and the PIRA is a clear enemy of the Crown and the United Kingdom and it’s people as a whole. Could possibly be something that you could argue is actually inspiring terrorist activity. And they’re allowed to do it. But display the flag of a foreign organisation which is an enemy of Israel? which I think you could agree is far less consequential than the attitude they are promoting at home. Full force of the law.

    Something is up. If the aim was actually preventing realistic terrorism, they would have been nicked years ago.


  • Depends on your stance on the death penalty.

    Article 37 of Anglicanism holds the stance:

    The Laws of the Realm may punish Christian men with death, for heinous and grievous offences.

    It is lawful for Christian men, at the commandment of the Magistrate, to wear weapons, and serve in the wars.

    However, many other people may have other stances

    ##Christian arguments in favour of capital punishment Some Christians argue that capital punishment helps to maintain order and protection in society. The Bible sets down the death penalty for some crimes, so it must be acceptable to God. This is often seen as retribution. The Church of England has not repealed the statement in Article 37 of its Thirty Nine Articles which says, “The Laws of the Realm may punish Christian men with death for heinous and grievous offences.”

    Saint Thomas Aquinas argued that peace in society was more important than reforming the sinner. He reflects the Roman Catholic Church’s teaching that the protection of the whole of society is more important than the individual. ##Christian arguments against capital punishment Some Christians would argue that capital punishment can never be justified. They would say this because:

    They believe Jesus Christ came to Earth to reform sinners, as he did with the woman caught in adultery in John 8:1-11. Jesus amended the Old Testament teaching on retribution in Matthew 5:38-39 when he said, “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’ But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also.” Christians believe in the sanctity of life – this means that life is holy and belongs to God, therefore only God has the power to take life. In Romans 12:17-19 it states, "Do not repay anyone evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of everybody … Do not take revenge, my friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: ‘It is mine to revenge; I will repay, says the Lord.’”

    Source: BBC Bitesize, CCEA Religious Studies

    I wouldn’t say that voting for Trump would make you a bad person. Or supporting him in the context that you believe he is better than the opposition. But it is down to reasoning also. Kamala Harris made some blunders or had policies which may have caused people to withhold their vote from her out of conscience.

    If someone is supporting trump because they believe abortion is murder and that Trump could end it, or that his economic policies are somehow better, or that he’d better society, I wouldn’t see them as a bad person. I would, however, if it was because they held hatred of a racist, homophobic or a transphobic nature. I don’t think simply supporting trump could make you a bad person, but the reasons you do could make you one.