Pro-stealing art without attribution
I know they teach bad economics which is probably the main reason why they ride hard for capitalism.
About how prices always adjust perfectly to meet demand and how minimum wages forced upon by the evil Government and trade unions prevent free markets from working efficiently.
How Government imposed price controls are bad because it distorts the markets. How centrally planned economies are inefficient.
It’s difficult to tell which part of this he is serious about. Irony poisoning.
Comparing alleged street thugs to the American deep state.
Its like comparing a burglar to a capitalist.
Yea no one was thinking about that. Blacklist, whitelist stuff all over again .
And it’s not clear whether it’s even about its “racist origins” that’s just the reason provided.
I don’t get much of it either. My guess is there is a lot of talk going on behind the scenes.
I don’t think a purge right now is necessary especially given that the user count is pretty stagnant.
It was all working fine. Splitting dunk tank into dredge tank was a good idea but idk why they removed and renamed it all together.
Damn. All the times I listened to Wakko. :/
New York is NWA 
US did pay the price once, very small for what it did, 9/11.
And Bush killed millions afterwards. Now the Democrats want to work with the same Republicans.
You all had your garb… rubbish vs rubbish moment already and rubbish won.
Chinese authorities are demanding wealthy individuals and companies double-check their taxes for unpaid liabilities in a move that threatens to further dent investor confidence in the world’s second-largest economy.
If rich people can’t pay taxes, they shouldn’t be investing.
“China’s fiscal deficits have reached a tipping point,” said Gary Ng, a senior economist at Natixis. “There is more urgency to find alternative revenue sources . . . and taxing the wealthy and some companies creates a less direct economic impact on most residents.”
Economists should be sent to Mars tbh
Nuclear
There are stations with no public toilets? What a shithole.
i know i’m being a 
but i despise the term ‘taxpayer funds’/‘taxpayer money’. besides being completely wrong in nearly all cases, it places taxes above the people, above labor.
‘American taxpayer is paying for the genocide in Gaza’. No, every person/entity using U.S. Dollars is paying for it. Even foreign countries are indirectly paying for it.
if you want the mainstream perspective look up ‘quantity theory of money’. from that it follows, less spending means less money and less inflation. so, spending rules reduce inflation by constraining the Government (but not commercial bank lending).
it can be true (sometimes), if you leave the economy with massive unemployment due to insufficient spending so that people don’t have money, it slows down and eventually shrinks but hey atleast there is ze price stabilité.
if you want non-mainstream macroecon books, these two ones I have read and can recommend. 1 2
The profits being made on those assets aren’t being kept for Russia to use in the future. They’re now being used to fund Ukraine
Rachel, Where do “profits” on these assets come from? These aren’t corporate bonds but Government bonds. The Governments (US, UK and others) are paying the defence contractors using public money.
If there were no Russian foreign reserves being stolen, would the west not have sent weapons to Ukraine? Of course not! The weapons manufacturers have to make profits, it would come out of a different Government account.
They are making excuses to make it look like the public isn’t paying for it.
Ctrl+F “Israel”
No results
What happened to maximizing shareholder value?