deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Hope folks will actually stick to claims such as this when the time comes
Now there’s that print monitor that’s on by default, and can only be shut up by using a command line. Wtf? In the 21st century?
Lemme get your russian immigrant wife to setup that VR headset for you, so that you can disable any process you like like it’s Jarvis
Edit: Care to point to my wrongs?
In that case you wouldn’t have gotten the security part and your time and, maybe, money would have been lost, but you not having this certificate, ironically, demonstrates you learned enough
Just curious what you’re up to, bud
Make sure the OP provides you with a binary first
bash: fewer: command not found
#2. Use a VPN. Mullvad is great but they recently removed port-forwarding so if you care about port-forwarding I recommend going with something like ProtonVPN (paid).
#3. Bind your VPN to your torrent client. (I recommend using QBittorrent)
Maybe before suggesting these two, which are more go-to than they should be, you should have suggested checking their national, cultural and legislative view on piracy and, if at least two result positive, should have suggested to search for websites that are totally shady but look good and work better, that host downloadables either via torrent or direct downloads. Many nations have their own.
Feel free to consider the above as #2 and then go from there, my bud PRUSSIA_x86
Yeah but how much for 4?
Wish I could tell you, buddy
How about the good old Danny Trejo?
Have you tried complaining to the hottest tech support employee at your company?
AFAIK tor wouldn’t be able to handle regular streaming of 4k movies, constant sending/receiving of e-mail, downloading of AAA videogames and uploading porn 1080p/60fps. Tor is an instrument which has its purpose. It’s like saying stirring tea with a screwdriver should be normalized.
Wait. Wasn’t Glenn battered to death?
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Who cares about performance when you can have performance
Bummer
Aren’t you?
What is the perceived problem, then?
Make sure to read this thoroughly this time.
[…]it’s almost always a manufactured limitation.
Doesn’t that sound like a good description of a problem?
I think I’ve only ever encountered a single website that didn’t actually technically work on Firefox[…]
There’s gonna be a hell of a lot more of them, buddy. You’re gonna have to hang your cat on your balcony to get an estimate of future weather if you want to avoid using one of them how-are-these-even browsers.
Imagine yourself as a homosexual man in Iran (should be easy). Would you say that hiding that big part of you from everyone and even go as far as marrying a woman you don’t even like just not to arouse suspicion makes the problem disappear? Just the fact that you need to spoof your useragent to view a shitty website, the developer of which would (should) die under a car one day 🤞, is a solid proof that you will soon be that homosexual man in Iran.
Not related much, but imagine being a citizen of ancient Greece having to walk for hours under killing sun, gushing barbarians’ eyes and slicing wolves on your way to the Olympic games only to be told by a feller with a lisp: “Excuse me, sir! Video recording is not allowed here.”. It’s a comfy time we live in actually.
Edit: spelling