What exactly is the goal of this confrontation?
What exactly is the goal of this confrontation?
See also: bullshit Jobs
U-Haul trailer when you need it?
Dems removed filibuster for all appointment except scotus in 2013 then R’s removed for scotus in 2017. Now republicans could have done it anyway on 2017 even without precedent, and Democrats could have forced merick garland in if they had gone fully nuclear. I’d call it equally shared
That would make sense if there were facts that we all agreed on……
Apparently other people want other things… like civil discourse and pertinent analysis. just move along already
Followed closely by war with Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Jordan and Iran. Escalation is bad for everyone.
Yes! Geo ip filtering got rid of so much brute forcing for me.
My favorite part of daily walking / train / bike share commute is using a particular mid block crosswalk with flashing lights to stop 4 lanes of traffic at rush hour.
95% of trips are 30 miles or less. Of course everyone is the exception, we’re all above average drivers here.
Whether or not it’s a good thing is totally a fair point for discussion. Sidewalks and dedicated driving lanes were not the only possible solution.
It is germane to the subject because zoning laws were invented to perpetuate segregation.
And even if it was pointed at random human equipment it’s so far away that you need a very special radio and antenna; not just any old satellite is necessarily going to do the trick. I think the signal strength is around -196db iirc so incredibly faint, and The antennas they use to communicate with voyager are massive.
Propaganda is most effective when there is a kernel of truth.
I run a local MediaWiki appliance from turnkeylinux, super easy to spin up in proxmox.
Idk Still sounds to me like this is mostly a clever way to denigrate and dismiss people who aren’t doing things the “right” way.
And I also don’t buy that patriotic duty is the only motivation to work on improving things
But if it works for you then good on ya
I know that’s the argument but Framing it as ‘the new folks on the block don’t want to build bridges’ isn’t a very good way to build bridges.
Basically I think this whole analysis is a lazy way to dismiss the new left. Not that they’re perfect or anything, but I think there is an equal responsibility for both groups to work together.
With identity politics, it seems even worsened that the new left cares about ideological purity and sin which prevents coalition type movements.
This critique is pervasive and has always rung hollow to me when trying to navigate this divide. The onus is also on the old left to build bridges imho
Pretty damning with faint praise there really.
Nah this would just unlock a new trove of racist tropes for him