ᥫ᭡ 𐑖ミꪜᴵ𝔦 ᥫ᭡

  • 2 Posts
  • 51 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 26th, 2024

help-circle

  • So you want to challenge their ways by their rules!!

    I think what’s naive is knowing history, and still repeating the past’s mistakes, a revolution may have all the flashy and beautiful themes like liberty and union but if it’s not built on a solid ethical foundation then it’s doomed to repeat the pasts mistakes ( war, genocides… Etc ) even if the near future outcome is what you’re hoping for, It will all collapse… again

    I’m not referring to the act of commenting on a website as the sole method of change, this is just one tiny step, how do you think a small group of people ( some call them capitalists, billionaires, elites, whatever you wanna call them… ) are able to control the majority… It’s because they put their ideological differences aside, and They’re organizated and they plan for the future…

    What I meant by that comment is that if you aren’t on their networks of surveillance they have less control over you, think about it from a bigger perspective now, their food system, their banking institutions, their schooling systems… etc etc…

    And make no mistake, They’re not threatened by your philosophy, especially if it’s a philosophy like theirs ( uses violence as a solution ), They’re threatened by your action, try to exit their banking system and see how hard it is, try to evade Surveillance and see how hard it is… Try to be independent in terms of food and see how hard it is… you can’t do it alone, but with a group of like minded people, you have a chance















  • AFAIK he’s reliable when it comes to facts

    he does have some facts, he only shares the ones that suites his narrative, what kind of journalism is that?! journalism is about following the truth no matter where it goes… but he doesn’t do that, he just misquotes people and say : “see, they said that, what awful people”

    for example, in a recent video he made about the EFF he said that they support kids looking at porn, but off course they never said that, they said they’re against ID’ing people who watch porn, because that’s a serious threat to online anonymity…

    Also in a recent video about the EFF he literally made statements they never made, it was so obvious that one of his loyal conservative fans called him out on it

    surprised he didn’t shadowban this comment, quot

    … My default position is that any software-based organization is going to be run by libtards, but your accusations simply don’t line up with the articles. “If you have the wrong politics, you should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, that’s their repeated stance they’ve stated over and over”. Links please “If you’re a Republican … and happened to be standing outdoors on that day, you should be in jail. That’s the EFF’s stance.” Again, links please"

    to Lunduke as long as he’s getting push back from the left leaning individuals in these groups, then he must be on the right path, that’s how bias works not truth