• 0 Posts
  • 178 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 17th, 2025

help-circle

  • I will put those people into the “status symbol” group.

    They may not give a fuck about the politics, the quality issues or being lied to, but they still want a Tesla for a reason. They could save money by buying a different car that performs equally or better. So they don’t buy it because of the price.

    With no other incentive it leads me to the conclusion they want it because they think it makes them look “better” than everyone who doesn’t have one.








  • It’s neat how you assume I didn’t hate how fucking old Biden was either?

    That wasn’t my biggest issue with Biden though. My issue with Biden was that he was part of the systemic issue that’s been destroying the US democracy for decades. He didn’t mind corporations bribing the politicians. He didn’t mind people indepting themselves for the rest of their lives just to get an education. He didn’t mind the gab between the richest and the poorest. He didn’t mind going to war to serve the military industrial complex. Biden is what I would refer to as a corrupt asshole by european standards, who doesn’t give half a shit about the working class, only the interests of his rich masters.

    So kindly stop assuming anyone who doesn’t support Trump, supports Biden or Harris. They’re part of the same corrupt system, designed specifically to supress the working class, and they fucking love it.


  • If Bernie is to be elected in 2028 he’ll be 91 by the end of his term. If he continues in 2032, he’ll be 95. That is far too fucking old to be a politician. I know his view is what USA needs and has needed for a long time, but it’s far too little too late. The window for Bernie to be president was 2016, and the american people and the democratic party fucked that up. It’s time to move on.

    Instead you do exactly what they’re doing now. Bernie uses his influence with the people to give AOC a platform to make her his protege for 2028. He’s currently putting her out there as a voice of reason, and passing the torch to her.









  • Jeg har ikke rigtigt noget imod idéen om et mærkesystem. Det er begrænsende og indskrænkende, helt klart, men er det ikke også netop det der skal til for faktisk på personligt plan at kunne gøre noget? Der er vel ikke nogen der kan forvente at hvis vi alle sammen skal bidrage til den grønne omstilling, at 90% af os ikke kommer til også at få en form for livsstilsændring? Det vil naturligvis handle om balance, giver det mening kun at have 1 flyrejse om året? Eller er 6 mere rigtigt?

    Jeg har bestemt ikke hele svaret, men jeg synes egentligt ikke at det er urimeligt at vi alle sammen bliver tvunget til at gå lidt på kompromis, og helst på en måde der gør at dem der fråser mest med ressourcerne skal gå mere ned i livskvalitet, indtil vi har metoder der gør det muligt at leve mere bæredygtigt. En af metoderne kunne være kvoter for sådan noget som flyrejser, privatkørsel, varer der bliver transporteret rundt om kloden 17 gange inden man selv køber det. Byggeriet har i forvejen begrænsninger på CO2 aftrykket af bygninger. Det vil ikke være umuligt at indføre på andre ting. Det vil kræve en form for overvågning af vores forbrugsvaner, så vi vil også alle sammen skulle gå på kompromis med vores privatliv (igen, igen).

    Jeg har ikke noget imod at skulle gå ned i levestandard, og jeg skal sgu også gerne lade mig overvåge lidt mere, for i sidste ende handler det bare om, om vi vil blive ved med at have en beboelig planet eller ej. Des mere ubeboelig planeten bliver, des større problemer vil vi få med krige, klimaflygtninge og naturkatastrofer, der nok skal sørge for at vores livskvalitet forsvinder helt.