I’m not a tankie. And clubs already do their own closed circuit TV surveillance. And no my argument is not reducto ad absurdum. There is a growing and pervasive problem with drugging drinks in American bars. I only brought it up as a side benefit anyway. I’d really like the convenience of seeing how hot a bar is instead of having to pay to get in only to see that it’s lame and leave.
You’re out of touch, just visit nearly any page on Instagram to see hours of footage of clubbing and bar hopping.
Filing you in public is not a violation of your privacy especially in a limited scope like a single club. That’s not at all equivalent to saying I should be able to read your emails.
Public safety needs to be weighed against civil rights. I don’t think women should be drugged because of a extreme fundamentalist a paranoid interpretation of privacy rights.
Also people want to club where it’s happening. Even if a club has a lot of people they could still not be dancing.
No, because people won’t die without affordable rental cars.
No because not all landlords are capitalized equally. A new investor with a huge mortgage would. An old landlord with paid off property wouldn’t. Unless they collude.
Imagine believing this.
Vote harder, change the party from inside, blue no matter who!
No way this is real. The brain looks like a gyro rotisserie.
They need to get a better image consultant. She’s quitting for the very reason she was appealingly to her supporters.
No, but I’d prevent that by not having drunk antics. It’s not like other people in the bar can’t see you.
I think this is great and don’t understand why so many people balk at it. Do you think you have an expectation of privacy in a bar? And head counts doesn’t tell you how many coeds are there. And this would add an additional layer of security with more eyes able to catch predators spiking drinks or starting fights.
Public: So do something about it.
Biden: I-i-i-if I do that, I’ll be a baka.
You were given numerous material examples which you handwaved away. No one is dismissing your argument as emotional. It’s emotional because you refuse to engage with the material evidence before you and retreat to unfalsifiable definitions that are based on your feels. This means no one can prove you wrong because know one can know “you’re TRUE feelings” Typical concern trolling, seen it a million times.
Okay fair enough, you’re just a western fascist stooge.
Because voting Dem has turned out so well for everyone hasn’t it.
If only he were in some position of power to do something about it hmmmmmm.
Because he was running for President. Can’t be President unless you run so that counts as an official act too.
My political vocabulary doesn’t suck. You’re a typical reactionary tankie that thinks that using Lenin’s outdated analysis and calling it Marxism gives you the authority to dismiss the grievances of the colonized.
Marxism and capitalism doesn’t have stages. Where capitalism exists all of Marx’s critiques apply. You use the tied old “muh imperialism” argument because you’re a Russian chauvinist that fears that the fascist accusations could apply to current day Russia and the fallen Soviet Union.
They’re not the majority but there’s certainly a lot of footage of just how packed a club is.