I’ve two Mint VMs in Virtualbox. One hosts internal services and has critical data. The other is hosting services exposed to the internet and has no data of value.
I think I can paravirtualize one of these VMs, I think using docker. I’d end up with a single image I could then easily migrate to physical hardware.
Am I on the right track? I’ve no problem figuring out how. But, I’m not sure which means is best and why.
That is a stupid take
Take it up with MLK.
I can see where your chain of logic lies
Incredible feat considering you didn’t ask me shit.
I assumed the rest continued in ignorance and bad faith.
The geese are known for being fearless, aggressive, and quite hard to fight back against.
Colonel Kuntz in Apocalypse Now delivers a monologue about the commitment of the enemy.
You’ve obviously never fought a Canadian goose before, let alone a pair of them. We once went into a flock to feed some geese. We left the flock after we had fed them and this old goose came running after us and it was quaking. It couldn’t see.
We went back there and they had spat up every piece of bread. It was in a pile. A pile of little pieces of bread. And I remember… I… I… I cried. I wept like some grandmother. I wanted to tear my teeth out. I didn’t know what I wanted to do. And I want to remember it. I never want to forget it. I never want to forget.
And then I realized… like I was shot… like I was shot with a diamond… a diamond bullet right through my forehead. And I thought, my God… the genius of that. The genius. The will to do that. Perfect, genuine, complete, crystalline, pure. And then I realized they were stronger than we. Because they could stand that these were not monsters. These were geese… wild birds. These geese who fought with their hearts, who had families, who had children, who were filled with love… but they had the strength… the strength… to do that.
If I had ten divisions of those geese, then our troubles here would be over very quickly. You have to have geese who are moral… and at the same time who are able to utilize their primordial instincts to kill without feeling… without passion… without judgment… without judgment! Because it’s judgment that defeats dogs.
I respect your agency in your learning process and assume personal wisdom.
I learned very little useful studying the Bible and philosophy by myself. Some subjects are just that way, such as Capital. And, no one comes just wanting to learn the material. All want an opportunity for praxis.
A couple Canadian geese would’ve taken down the whole bar, the dog, and a probably a couple pigs.
Well, privacy can be infringed as a motivator after tax and campaign finance reform. Prison is a bigger motivator.
Taxes, government ownership, or communal ownership. For example, tax all wealth above $100m at 100%.
If I were in a position of power I’d hopefully willingly give up some privacy. But, no law can sit in judgement, let alone something so simple.
If humans constantly tempted by wealth and power, who then fall victim to it, have their right to privacy infringed, then they’ll go right on feeding their addictions, no matter the cost of maintenance of privacy?
Above, I wrote one cohesive response, not three snippets. It’s powerful because great people wrote it: from King to Wiki. I’m just a guy who knows you’re not looking for ideas.
Thank you for the compliment. But, lucky for us, humanity has much better choices.
Privacy is prerequisite to a life of dignity. It’s not a bargaining chip for another prerequisite.
Crystal clear piece of writing. Humans are obviously collectively responsible for the systems they create and perpetuate.
I am currently not smart/cognizant enough to think of a way.
An individual, regardless of wealth, power, and ability, is powerless relative the systemic mandate. Large groups produce mediocrity. Their outcomes fail to meet the prerequisite urgency of the human mandate.
However if you think there is a clever way to gum up the system in a purely procedural/bureaucratic way, I am all ears.
The first rule consists of a relatively small number of people, who know little to no information concerning organization assets (such as member identities). This limits the harm that can be done to the organization as a whole by any individual member. The structure can range from a strict hierarchy to an extremely distributed organization, depending on the group’s ideology, its operational area, the communications technologies available, and the nature of the mission.
Good idea. On another platform I could once put notes next to a username, shows up every post.
And who signs 90% of these apparatchick’s paychecks? It’s the billionaires.
The billionaires are the ones LARPing as the puppeteers. And if we don’t challenge them, their shitty LARPs are uncontested and become real.
The billionaires are the primary beneficiaries of the status quo.
I feel like you’re anthropomorphizing. The vast majority of the billionaires aren’t human. We deregulated banks with a partial repeal of Glass-Steagall and the Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act. And, we continued to strengthen corporate personhood.
Today, the banks are the billionaires that own the stock in the corporations that exercise their right to free speech in campaign donations to puppeteer politicians into making the status quo worse for the vast majority of humans.
Damned glad to meet you, hypnotron. You good on supplies? My cup seem to overflow, at the moment.
Fuck. I was overcomplicating it.