• 9 Posts
  • 445 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle

  • AbsentBird@lemm.eetoPeople Twitter@sh.itjust.worksPermission
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Indeed Inspector HelixDab, that is the letter of the law.

    That said, anyone who says that to a woman deserves to have their balls kicked it, regardless of the legality. Laws are largely written to maintain order and uphold the status quo, they are not a divine tool for determining morality or justice; Rosa Parks broke the law by sitting in a part of the bus reserved for white people, but in retrospect that was a vital act of resistance.

    Tolerance of patriarchal domination does not make for a more just society, it only makes things worse. Knee those balls if you can get away with it.


  • Why are you being so condescending?

    Phones get lost, stolen, damaged beyond repair. I knew a woman whose phone fell into a body of water on vacation and couldn’t be recovered.

    When you have an app used by millions of people, which they depend on for tracking wellness, health issues, reproductive planning, etc. it makes sense to have a cloud backup for those inevitable situations.

    Also yes, not everyone knows how to initiate an NFC file transfer, or even how to navigate their phone’s file system to select the data to transfer. You often have to develop software to the lowest common denominator. There’s open source options like Mensinator for people who want more control and privacy, but most software on the app store is targeted at less technical people.









  • I think you’re the one who is moving the goalposts. There’s no requirement for the monkeys to submit their output, the test is whether the text of Hamlet is among their key presses. As long as there is a nonzero chance, then there is a 100% chance it would appear in an infinite system. Any non-zero probability times infinity has a 100% chance of occuring eventually.

    The monkeys mostly produce gibberish, that’s the vast majority of the potential outputs, but among that massive number is also the full text of Hamlet.





  • AbsentBird@lemm.eetoPeople Twitter@sh.itjust.worksRich tax.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 days ago

    All I’m saying is that taxing the rich is good and necessary for as long as they exist. Sure, our current system is a disparity engine, but it’s not impossible for us to dilute the effects of it with progressive tax policies, as has been done in years past.

    Personally I don’t see it as a choice of either tax the rich or abolish capitalism. I see the two goals as mutually connected to liberation and progress: tax the rich until we can replace the system with a better one.

    Building coalitions around progressive policies within the current system can help shift more people into alignment with post-capitalist thinking. Fomenting divisions between socialists and progressives does the opposite; solidarity forever.


  • AbsentBird@lemm.eetoPeople Twitter@sh.itjust.worksRich tax.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    You don’t have to go that far back to find a time when the rich were heavily taxed and income disparity was much smaller. Keep going back and you can find other times when the disparity was greater and the rich were taxed less.

    The best outcome may require the system to be torn down, but it’s clearly also possible to tax the rich significantly more even with the system already in place.


  • Noone has to do anything.

    The original tweet essentially said that all women have a mission from God to use their bodies to make babies. At the very least it’s a value judgment on how women live their lives.

    There seems to be a sustained campaign against having kids.

    I have never encountered this. There is absolutely a sustained campaign for bodily autonomy, and for the acceptance of people who choose not to reproduce; but I haven’t encountered anyone talking like the original tweet, saying women have a mission from God to not have kids or something.

    This is just fighting against the natural way of life.

    Here we go again with imposing judgements on people who don’t reproduce. I feel like that’s the bigger ‘sustained campaign’ in this conversation. The natural way of life changes over time, it used to be natural to die young from a bacterial infection, or to have your village sacked by marauders. We don’t need to have the same pressures to keep reproduction high as in the past. Populations are still increasing, but people are out here blaming women for not doing it faster? Just take a breath, it’s going to be okay.


  • AbsentBird@lemm.eetoScience Memes@mander.xyzhard to argue with
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    I think they’re advocating that women can choose for themselves what kind of person to be, and the fact their bodies are capable of gestating new humans doesn’t obligate them to do so.

    It’s sort of like how the fact a man’s body may be capable of entertaining others by dressing their penis up in a tiny coat and hat doesn’t mean we should bully an entire gender into making that the purpose of their existence, nor does it mean we’re advocating for a world without sharp dressed dicks.

    Let people live their lives based on who they are, not the abilities of their genitals.