Aw, this makes me wistful for my sex-filled relationship and travel right after college. Cheers to that sexy couple.
Aw, this makes me wistful for my sex-filled relationship and travel right after college. Cheers to that sexy couple.
Quick color correction attempt for main image–though the light was super yellow, so it’s not great.
Here, fixed color for you
People often use upvotes/downvotes for things they like or don’t like instead of for relevance, as they’re supposed to be used.
Consider cow paths / desire paths or the iPhone 4 “you’re holding it wrong” fiasco. In my opinion, rather than battling people / trying to stop them from using things in the way they’ve discovered is natural/efficient, embrace/accommodate/learn from them.
On a somewhat related note, I also agree with @[email protected]: “why not create multiple communities that can cater to different individuals with different tastes?” It seem like “solving” the issue of guys posting on /c/gonewild getting downvoted by taking away downvotes is addressing the wrong problem. If a nontrivial portion of that community is signaling that it thinks male nudity deserves a downvote, find/create a welcoming community, or empower the moderators to view the members who are downvoting that content so they can be warned or blocked (if a community’s rules prohibit downvoting on the basis of gender, or whatever).
Separately, seeing something that has a score of -11 (+2 / -13) signals something different to me than something that has a score of 2 (+2). Taking away downvotes removes that information.
Source?
archive.org can be very slow–I swear they’re retrieving data from a tape library. Maybe try refreshing the web page after a ~minute?
Dammit, where’s the video stabilizer bot when we need it?