And next up, European cars. Welcome to the Democratic People’s Republic of America.
And next up, European cars. Welcome to the Democratic People’s Republic of America.
If only people could have known. Like, by reading the only text that is shown on the incognito tab.
The point is that you then take off earlier on Friday.
I take offence at the term digital drivers license. It implies the owners have passed some kind of test to use the Internet.
Digital passport is a much more appropriate comparison.
Yeah fair enough. Key part was “arcs that go nowhere”. I got so incredibly tired of TV shows that think the way to do mystery is drawing out plot far too slowly, in hopes you’ll tune in next episode.
Then again, regarding new trek, I only watched season 1 of Discovery, and the first episode of Picard. I ain’t got no patience for this.
The token limit for gpt 4o is over a million. Wtf.
I’m not sure that’s the case - spacex has done hundreds of successful flights in which their rockets (which indeed are just relative cheap fuel tanks with some very expensive engines underneath) came back to land. Not a lot of experience with this new model though, which is what the test flights are for.
From what I heard in previous articles (and what this one hints at as well) is that the FAA just doesn’t have the manpower to check the amount of flights current space agencies are aiming for.
But without an official response from the FAA, we won’t know.
And most important (for me): self-contained episodes. No season long story arcs that go nowhere.
That’s a a bit too absolute way to look at it.
From their point of view the goal isn’t to abolish human involvement, but to minimise the cost. So if they can do the job at the same quality with a quarter of the personnel through AI assistance for less cost, obviously they’re gonna do that.
At the same time, just because humans having crappy jobs is the current way we solve the problem of people getting money, doesn’t mean we should keep on doing that. Basic income would be a much nicer solution for that, for example. Try to think a bit less conservatively.
I’m not sure how long ago that was, but LLM context sizes have grown exponentially in the past year, from 4k tokens to over a hundred k. That doesn’t necessarily affect the quality of the output, although you can’t expect it to summarize what it can’t hold on memory.
troed:
It’s problematic when people conflate their gut feelings for facts.
Also troed:
I understand activitypub better than creator of Lemmy
Well, that convinced me. Thanks for your insight on the matter, I now know how to value the rest of your comments.
It has been five years since it was created though.
And in one of those cases they are violating a very clear “this is not okay” signal, and in the other they are not.
What I think or what they “may” do is irrelevant regarding public data. What matters is sending a clear signal what you are and are not okay with.
Whether you actively participate in helping them get your data or not might not effectively matter in them acquiring it, but it may heavily impact the fine they get for it afterwards. You might be okay with them getting your data for free, but I’m not, sweet summer child.
They can still train ML models (create profit) from the data they get from you without consent.
I thought it was push after subscription.
Public is not the same as public domain.
I’m not a lawyer, but Federation would probably imply consent to sharing the data. Whereas defederation would strongly imply you’re not okay with sharing the data with that entity.
Yay, mob justice!