This is for 0mq right? I remember reading Pieter Hintjens about this realization he had over a long time of developing 0mq.

deleted by creator

From Nowhere to Now here!

Congrats.

Is there a static typed equivalent of Python? Not MyPy, but a static Pythonic language.

I learnt of Kevin Mitnick from HN many years ago. I was pleasantly surprised to see him as the face of a company’s in-house security trainings. May he be at peace.

I have been using these blogs for my learning and enlightenment:

1. Eli Bendersky’s website - Go - feed
2. Ardan Labs - feed
3. Ben Hoyt’s technical writing - feed
4. The Go Blog - feed
5. Applied Go - feed
6. research!rsc - feed
7. Three Dots Labs - feed

Thunderclient

Looks great, thanks for the rec.

Hey, I just found that it is common to think that divio plagiarized from diataxis. It is not. A person at divio came up with this and asked permission to spin it off into its own website.

I just learned this from footnote at this article: https://www.hillelwayne.com/post/problems-with-the-4doc-model/#fn:diataxis

It helped me. I jumped into AWS positions without any certifications. I was fine as long as I stuck what I needed to do. However, every time I had to work around a limitation of the architecture or come up with a strategy, it felt difficult as I had no context outside of the few services I touched. So I did the solution architecture cert and then the dev associate to understand how things are being planned in my project and plan and strategize better.

Great tip. This is simple enough to use on the daily.

Same here. I read a recent thread on HN about Joplin, it is electron based, but FOSS. You could try it.

• How old are you?
• What is your favorite breakfast?
• What is the name of your first pet?
• What is the name of your first teacher?

Programming.dev with local filter is a good replacement for /r/programming for me. I am loving it here.

I feel like the original source for this is diataxis.fr.

I am a .NET dev and love the language, ecosystem, tooling and recently their open source initiatives. Few things that frustrate me. Here are my whines:

• Naming of framework — asp.net core / asp.net could have been one word say, Katana.
• Language features — I am still comfortable with C#6 or may be a few things from C#7. I know I do not have to use all new stuff, but I feel left out. Too much inertia as of now to get over the hump.
• I wanted to break into GUI stuff for long time, but there is no clear path. Avalonia is good and I hope the documentation becomes good as explained by Mike in a recent podcast.
• The company I work for has an initiative of OSP Open Source Practice. I feel bad that .NET/C# is not included in this ever. OSP only means Java, Python and probably Go. It is a nitpick, but MS has done so much to make .NET open source, yet even technology oriented companies think of MS development platform as a closed system.

Hello and excellent news. I realized just now that these are features are exclusive to programming.dev which is awesome. Good work!